Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32827230›Full record

ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2020

Treatment patterns and costs among patients with OAB treated with combination oral therapy, sacral nerve stimulation, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, or onabotulinumtoxinA in the United States.

Stephen R Kraus, Aki Shiozawa, Shelagh M Szabo, Christina Qian, Basia Rogula, John Hairston

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05309993 (INvestigation of TENS Efficacy Versus Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05309993 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

INvestigation of TENS Efficacy Versus Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of New MexicoRan2022 to 2025Enrolled27ConditionsOveractive Bladder, Overactive Bladder Syndrome, Urinary Urge Incontinence, Urinary Bladder, OveractiveArmsPTNS, TENS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen R KrausDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas, San Antonio, Texas.
Aki ShiozawaMedical Affairs, Astellas Pharma Global Development Inc, Northbrook, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0001-9757-6337
Shelagh M SzaboHealth Economics, Broadstreet HEOR, Vancouver, Canada.
Christina QianHealth Economics, Broadstreet HEOR, Vancouver, Canada.
Basia RogulaHealth Economics, Broadstreet HEOR, Vancouver, Canada.
John HairstonMedical Affairs, Astellas Pharma Global Development Inc, Northbrook, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0003-2098-9058
Broadcom (Canada) · CAAstellas Pharma (United States) · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTreatment patterns and costs were characterized among patients with overactive bladder (OAB) receiving later-line target therapies (combination mirabegron/antimuscarinic, sacral nerve stimulation [SNS], percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation [PTNS], or onabotulinumtoxinA).

methodsIn a retrospective cohort study using 2013 to 2017 MarketScan databases, two partially overlapping cohorts of adults with OAB ("IPT cohort": patients with incident OAB pharmacotherapy use; "ITT cohort," incident target therapy) with continuous enrollment were identified; first use was index. Demographic characteristics, treatment patterns and costs over the 24-month follow-up period were summarized. Crude mean (standard deviation [SD]) OAB-specific (assessed by OAB diagnostic code or pharmaceutical dispensation record) costs were estimated according to target therapy.

resultsThe IPT cohort comprised 54 066 individuals (mean [SD] age 58.5 [15.0] years; 76% female), the ITT cohort, 1662 individuals (mean [SD] age 62.8 [14.9] years; 83% female). Seventeen percent of the IPT cohort were treated with subsequent line(s) of therapy after index therapy; among those, 73% received antimuscarinics, 23% mirabegron, and 1.4% a target therapy. For the ITT cohort, 32% were initially treated with SNS, 27% with onabotulinumtoxinA, 26% with combination mirabegron/antimuscarinic, and 15% with PTNS. Subsequently, one-third of this cohort received additional therapies. Mean (SD) costs were lowest among patients receiving index therapy PTNS ($6959 [$7533]) and highest for SNS ($29 702 [$26 802]).

conclusionsCosts for SNS over 24 months are substantially higher than other treatments. A treatment patterns analysis indicates that oral therapies predominate; first-line combination therapy is common in the ITT cohort and uptake of oral therapy after procedural options is substantial.

Indexed as

AcetanilidesAdultAgedBotulinum Toxins, Type ACombined Modality TherapyElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscarinic AntagonistsRetrospective StudiesThiazolesTibial NerveUnited StatesUrinary Bladder, OveractiveAcetanilidesBotulinum Toxins, Type AmirabegronMuscarinic Antagonistsonabotulinum toxin AThiazolescombination mirabegron/antimuscarinic therapycosts and resource utilizationonabotulinumtoxinAoveractive bladderpercutaneous tibial nerve stimulationsacral nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32827230
PMCPMC7693053
OpenAlexW3081333635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.