Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32827116›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Beneficiary of nitrifying bacteria for enhancing lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides L.) growths align with carp (Cyprinus carpio) cultivation in an aquaponic system.

Nur Ajijah, Arina Yuthi Apriyana, Lies Sriwuryandari, Ekaputra Agung Priantoro, Selly Ayu Janetasari, Tanti Yulianti Raga Pertiwi, Ajeng Maryam Suciati, Ardeniswan, Tarzan Sembiring

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nur AjijahResearch Unit for Clean Technology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bandung, Indonesia. nur.ajijah@lipi.go.id.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3936-4074
Arina Yuthi ApriyanaResearch Unit for Clean Technology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bandung, Indonesia.
Lies SriwuryandariResearch Unit for Clean Technology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bandung, Indonesia.
Ekaputra Agung PriantoroResearch Unit for Clean Technology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bandung, Indonesia.
Selly Ayu JanetasariResearch Unit for Clean Technology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bandung, Indonesia.
Tanti Yulianti Raga PertiwiResearch Unit for Clean Technology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bandung, Indonesia.
Ajeng Maryam SuciatiResearch Unit for Clean Technology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bandung, Indonesia.
ArdeniswanResearch Unit for Clean Technology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bandung, Indonesia.
Tarzan SembiringResearch Unit for Clean Technology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bandung, Indonesia.
Indonesian Institute of Sciences · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aquaponic system is an alternative strategy to treat aquaculture waste and achieve food independence. Bacteria play vital roles in the aquaponic system as they can transform ammonia or ammonium into nitrite and then into nitrate, which is more favorable for bacteria, fish, and plants. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of nitrifying bacteria (Nitrosomonas europaea Winogradsky and Nitrobacter winogradskyi Winslow) on the aquaponic system in terms of water quality, nutrient availability, and productivity of carp (Cyprinus carpio), lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. crispa), and vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides L.). The experiment consisted of four treatments: aquaculture of carp as a control for fish (A), hydroponic of lettuce and vetiver grass without nutrient addition as a control for plants (B), aquaponic (carp, lettuce, vetiver grass) (C), and aquaponic with nitrifying bacteria addition (D). The results showed nitrifying bacteria addition had a significant effect on daily growth rate (DGR) and relative growth rate (RGR) of lettuce within a treatment; on the other hand, the nitrifying bacteria did not give a significant effect to RGR of vetiver grass. The growth rate, specific growth rate, and survival rate of the carp in aquaculture treatment (A) were lower than in both aquaponic treatments (C and D). Nitrifying bacteria addition in the aquaponics system had a significant effect of increasing the orthophosphate concentration. Water quality was also indicated to be better in the aquaponic system than in the aquaculture system. The integration of aquaculture and hydroponics with the addition of nitrifying bacteria enables the formation of microorganism communities, nitrate, and orthophosphate, which lead to the improvement of water quality, nutrient availability, and plant growth.

Indexed as

CarpsChrysopogonAnimalsBacteriaLactucaNitrobacterAquaponicCarpLettuceNitrifying bacteriaVetiver grass

Identifiers

PMID32827116
OpenAlexW3080254952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.