Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32827083›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Effect of prism adaptation in patients with partially accommodative esotropia: clinical findings and surgical outcomes.

Yeonji Jang, Haeng-Jin Lee, Jae Ho Jung, Seong-Joon Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of Fresnel prism in small-angle esotropia (≤ 20 prism diopters) with fixation preference.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yeonji JangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Haeng-Jin LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea.
Jae Ho JungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Seong-Joon KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. ophjun@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7944-6990
Seoul National University Hospital · KRJeonbuk National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2017R1D1A1B03032985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the effects of prism adaptation on the surgical outcomes of individuals with partially accommodative esotropia (PAET).

methodsThe medical records of 51 patients with PAET who were managed surgically at single referral center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to prism adaptation. Data about sex, age, initial angle of deviation, final angle of deviation, stereoacuity, surgical dosage, and follow-up periods were collected. The main outcome of this study was motor outcomes at 12 months.

resultsEighteen patients had a history of prism adaptation (PA group) and 33 did not (augmented surgery group, AS group). One year after surgery, 12 (66.7%) patients in the PA group and 21 (63.6%) in the AS group achieved an angle of deviation less than 5 PD. The surgical success rate in both groups did not significantly differ (p = 1). After the first prism adaptation test, six patients had an angle of deviation similar to the previous angle; however, 12 patients had larger angle, and consequently required additional prism (prism builder). Two (33.3%) patients who were prism non-builders had deviation less than 5 PD during the final visit. However, among the prism builders, four (57.1%) and five (100%) patients who had prism added once and more than once, respectively, had less than 5 PD deviation during the final visit (p = 0.03).

conclusionNo significant differences were observed in terms of surgical outcomes between both groups. Nonetheless, in PA group, prism builders have better surgical outcomes than non-builders.

Indexed as

EsotropiaAdaptation, OcularEyeglassesFollow-Up StudiesHumansOculomotor MusclesOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAugmented surgeryPartially accommodative esotropiaPrism adaptationSurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID32827083
OpenAlexW3080224522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.