Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32827074›Full record

SynthesisLasers in medical science2021

A meta-analysis of fractional CO

Nan Wu, Hongyan Sun, Qian Sun, Lele Cong, Chenlu Liu, Yang Zheng, Lei Ma, Xianling Cong

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nan WuDepartment of Dermatology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Xiantai Road 126, Changchun, 130033, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Hongyan SunTissue Bank, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Qian SunDepartment of Dermatology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Xiantai Road 126, Changchun, 130033, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Lele CongDepartment of Dermatology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Xiantai Road 126, Changchun, 130033, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Chenlu LiuTissue Bank, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Yang ZhengDepartment of Dermatology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Xiantai Road 126, Changchun, 130033, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Lei MaTissue Bank, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Xianling CongDepartment of Dermatology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Xiantai Road 126, Changchun, 130033, Jilin, People's Republic of China. congxl@jlu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5790-4188
Union Hospital · CNJilin University · CN

Funding

Jilin Scientific and Technological Development Program 20190701061GH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and safety of ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser systems (CO

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisCarbon DioxideCicatrixHumansLasers, GasPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionPlatelet-Rich PlasmaPublication BiasRiskTime FactorsCarbon DioxideAblative fractional carbon dioxide laser systemsAcne scarAutologous platelet-rich plasmaMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID32827074
OpenAlexW3081322108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.