Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32827044›Full record

ArticlePain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2020

Modifying and Evaluating the Opioid Overdose Knowledge Scale for Prescription Opioids: A Pilot Study of the Rx-OOKS.

Jo Ann Shoup, Shane R Mueller, Ingrid A Binswanger, Anna V Williams, John Strang, Jason M Glanz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jo Ann ShoupInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
Shane R MuellerInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
Ingrid A BinswangerInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
Anna V WilliamsNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
John StrangNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Jason M GlanzInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado.

Funding

The Safety and Impact of Expanded Access to Naloxone in Health SystemsR01DA042059 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BINSWANGER, INGRID A, GLANZ, JASON M · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
Overdose Risk Assessment, Counseling and Naloxone Prescription in Health CareR34DA035952 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BINSWANGER, INGRID A · 2013 to 2015
$837k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042059NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA035952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a validated instrument that measures knowledge about prescription opioid overdose.

methodsWithin an integrated health care system, we adapted, piloted, and tested the reliability and predictive validity of a modified Opioid Overdose Knowledge Scale (OOKS) instrument specific to prescription opioids (Rx-OOKS) with a patient population prescribed long-term opioid therapy and potentially at risk of opioid overdose. We used an interdisciplinary team approach and patient interviews to adapt the instrument. We then piloted the survey on a patient sample and assessed it using Cronbach's alpha and logistic regression.

resultsRx-OOKS (N = 56) resulted in a three-construct, 25-item instrument. Internal consistency was acceptable for the following constructs: "signs of an overdose" (10 items) at α = 0.851, "action to take with opioid overdose" (seven items) at α = 0.692, and "naloxone use knowledge" (eight items) at α = 0.729. One construct, "risks of an overdose" (three items), had an α of 0.365 and was subsequently eliminated from analysis due to poor performance. We conducted logistic regression to determine if any of the constructs was strongly associated with future naloxone receipt. Higher scores on "actions to take in an overdose" had nine times the odds of receiving naloxone (odds ratio [OR] = 9.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.42-57.12); higher "naloxone use knowledge" scores were 15.8 times more likely to receive naloxone than those with lower scores (OR = 15.83, 95% CI = 1.68-149.17).

conclusionsThe Rx-OOKS survey instrument can reliably measure knowledge about prescription opioid overdose recognition and naloxone use. Further, knowledge about actions to take during an opioid overdose and naloxone use were associated with future receipt of naloxone.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseOpiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsPilot ProjectsPrescriptionsReproducibility of ResultsAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOverdosePrescription OpioidPsychometric Measures

Identifiers

PMID32827044
PMCPMC7593800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.