Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32826910›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

A machine learning-based chemoproteomic approach to identify drug targets and binding sites in complex proteomes.

Ilaria Piazza, Nigel Beaton, Roland Bruderer, Thomas Knobloch, Crystel Barbisan, Lucie Chandat, Alexander Sudau, Isabella Siepe, Oliver Rinner, Natalie de Souza and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ilaria Piazza *ETH Zürich, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, Department of Biology, Otto-Stern-Weg 3, 8093, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5895-6134
Nigel Beaton *Biognosys AG, Wagistrasse 21, 8952, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Roland BrudererBiognosys AG, Wagistrasse 21, 8952, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Thomas KnoblochBayer SAS, Crop Science Division, Lyon, France.
Crystel BarbisanBayer SAS, Crop Science Division, Lyon, France.
Lucie ChandatBayer SAS, Crop Science Division, Lyon, France.
Alexander SudauBayer SAS, Crop Science Division, Lyon, France.
Isabella SiepeBASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6661-5313
Oliver RinnerBiognosys AG, Wagistrasse 21, 8952, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Natalie de SouzaETH Zürich, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, Department of Biology, Otto-Stern-Weg 3, 8093, Zürich, Switzerland.
Paola PicottiETH Zürich, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, Department of Biology, Otto-Stern-Weg 3, 8093, Zürich, Switzerland. picotti@imsb.biol.ethz.ch.
Lukas ReiterBiognosys AG, Wagistrasse 21, 8952, Schlieren, Switzerland. lukas.reiter@biognosys.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-3139
Bayer (France) · FRBiognosys (Switzerland) · CHETH Zurich · CHBASF (Germany) · DEMax Delbrück Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemoproteomics is a key technology to characterize the mode of action of drugs, as it directly identifies the protein targets of bioactive compounds and aids in the development of optimized small-molecule compounds. Current approaches cannot identify the protein targets of a compound and also detect the interaction surfaces between ligands and protein targets without prior labeling or modification. To address this limitation, we here develop LiP-Quant, a drug target deconvolution pipeline based on limited proteolysis coupled with mass spectrometry that works across species, including in human cells. We use machine learning to discern features indicative of drug binding and integrate them into a single score to identify protein targets of small molecules and approximate their binding sites. We demonstrate drug target identification across compound classes, including drugs targeting kinases, phosphatases and membrane proteins. LiP-Quant estimates the half maximal effective concentration of compound binding sites in whole cell lysates, correctly discriminating drug binding to homologous proteins and identifying the so far unknown targets of a fungicide research compound.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProteomeBinding SitesBotrytisCell SurvivalComputational BiologyDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DiscoveryHeLa CellsHumansLigandsMass SpectrometryPhosphotransferasesProtein BindingProteolysisProteomicsLigandsPhosphotransferasesProteome

Identifiers

PMID32826910
PMCPMC7442650
OpenAlexW3080123711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.