Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32826882›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Behavioral and neuronal underpinnings of safety in numbers in fruit flies.

Clara H Ferreira, Marta A Moita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Imprecision in Vision: Lessons From Neural Circuits in the Fly.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Wild animals suppress the spread of socially transmitted misinformation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Clara H FerreiraChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal. clara.ferreira@neuro.fchampalimaud.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3955-1059
Marta A MoitaChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal. marta.moita@neuro.fchampalimaud.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5144-6905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living in a group allows individuals to decrease their defenses, enabling other beneficial behaviors such as foraging. The detection of a threat through social cues is widely reported, however, the safety cues that guide animals to break away from a defensive behavior and resume alternate activities remain elusive. Here we show that fruit flies display a graded decrease in freezing behavior, triggered by an inescapable threat, with increasing group sizes. Furthermore, flies use the cessation of movement of other flies as a cue of threat and its resumption as a cue of safety. Finally, we find that lobula columnar neurons, LC11, mediate the propensity for freezing flies to resume moving in response to the movement of others. By identifying visual motion cues, and the neurons involved in their processing, as the basis of a social safety cue this study brings new insights into the neuronal basis of safety in numbers.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSafetySocial BehaviorAnimalsCuesDrosophilaFemaleFreezingNeurons

Identifiers

PMID32826882
PMCPMC7442810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.