ArticleTranslational psychiatry2020
Machine learning for effectively avoiding overfitting is a crucial strategy for the genetic prediction of polygenic psychiatric phenotypes.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing disaster resilience in mountain villages using an improved DPSIR-A framework and multi-model machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Respiratory Infections After Nonpharmacological Interventions for COVID-19 in China Have Ended: Using Machine Learning Approaches to Support Pathogen Prediction at Admission.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025Article
- Genomic Prediction in a Self-Fertilized Progenies ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A quantum inspired machine learning approach for multimodal Parkinson's disease screening.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning architectures for influenza dynamics and treatment optimization: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Approach and Bioinformatics Analysis Discovered Key Genomic Signatures for Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Hepatocyte Remodeling and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancer informatics · 2025Review
- Identifying Depression Through Machine Learning Analysis of Omics Data: Scoping Review.JMIR nursing · 2024Article
- Machine Learning in Clinical Trials: A Primer with Applications to Neurology.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023Review
- Predicting COVID-19 disease severity from SARS-CoV-2 spike protein sequence by mixed effects machine learning.Computers in biology and medicine · 2022Article
- Application of machine learning algorithms in predicting HIV infection among men who have sex with men: Model development and validation.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Smooth-threshold multivariate genetic prediction incorporating gene-environment interactions.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Artificial intelligence powered statistical genetics in biobanks.Journal of human genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accuracy of previous genetic studies in predicting polygenic psychiatric phenotypes has been limited mainly due to the limited power in distinguishing truly susceptible variants from null variants and the resulting overfitting. A novel prediction algorithm, Smooth-Threshold Multivariate Genetic Prediction (STMGP), was applied to improve the genome-based prediction of psychiatric phenotypes by decreasing overfitting through selecting variants and building a penalized regression model. Prediction models were trained using a cohort of 3685 subjects in Miyagi prefecture and validated with an independently recruited cohort of 3048 subjects in Iwate prefecture in Japan. Genotyping was performed using HumanOmniExpressExome BeadChip Arrays. We used the target phenotype of depressive symptoms and simulated phenotypes with varying complexity and various effect-size distributions of risk alleles. The prediction accuracy and the degree of overfitting of STMGP were compared with those of state-of-the-art models (polygenic risk scores, genomic best linear-unbiased prediction, summary-data-based best linear-unbiased prediction, BayesR, and ridge regression). In the prediction of depressive symptoms, compared with the other models, STMGP showed the highest prediction accuracy with the lowest degree of overfitting, although there was no significant difference in prediction accuracy. Simulation studies suggested that STMGP has a better prediction accuracy for moderately polygenic phenotypes. Our investigations suggest the potential usefulness of STMGP for predicting polygenic psychiatric conditions while avoiding overfitting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.