Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32826505›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Prediction of the Functional Status of the Cochlear Nerve in Individual Cochlear Implant Users Using Machine Learning and Electrophysiological Measures.

Jeffrey Skidmore, Lei Xu, Xiuhua Chao, William J Riggs, Angela Pellittieri, Chloe Vaughan, Xia Ning, Ruijie Wang, Jianfen Luo, Shuman He

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring the relationship between electrophysiological measures of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and speech perception outcomes post-cochlear implantation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeffrey SkidmoreDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Lei XuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Xiuhua ChaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
William J RiggsDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Angela PellittieriThe Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Chloe VaughanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Xia NingDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Ruijie WangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jianfen LuoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Shuman HeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
The Ohio State University · USShandong Provincial Hospital · CNCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

NEURAL ENCODING AND AUDITORY PERCEPTION IN COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERSR01DC016038 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HE, SHUMAN · 2017 to 2021
$2.3M
Neural Encoding and Auditory Processing of Electrical Stimulation in Pediatric Cochlear Implant UsersR01DC017846 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HE, SHUMAN · 2019 to 2024
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016038NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to create an objective predictive model for assessing the functional status of the cochlear nerve (CN) in individual cochlear implant (CI) users.

designStudy participants included 23 children with cochlear nerve deficiency (CND), 29 children with normal-sized CNs (NSCNs), and 20 adults with various etiologies of hearing loss. Eight participants were bilateral CI users and were tested in both ears. As a result, a total of 80 ears were tested in this study. All participants used Cochlear Nucleus CIs in their test ears. For each participant, the CN refractory recovery function and input/output (I/O) function were measured using electrophysiological measures of the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) at three electrode sites across the electrode array. Refractory recovery time constants were estimated using statistical modeling with an exponential decay function. Slopes of I/O functions were estimated using linear regression. The eCAP parameters used as input variables in the predictive model were absolute refractory recovery time estimated based on the refractory recovery function, eCAP threshold, slope of the eCAP I/O function, and negative-peak (i.e., N1) latency. The output variable of the predictive model was CN index, an indicator for the functional status of the CN. Predictive models were created by performing linear regression, support vector machine regression, and logistic regression with eCAP parameters from children with CND and the children with NSCNs. One-way analysis of variance with post hoc analysis with Tukey's honest significant difference criterion was used to compare study variables among study groups.

resultsAll three machine learning algorithms created two distinct distributions of CN indices for children with CND and children with NSCNs. Variations in CN index when calculated using different machine learning techniques were observed for adult CI users. Regardless of these variations, CN indices calculated using all three techniques in adult CI users were significantly correlated with Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word and AzBio sentence scores measured in quiet. The five oldest CI users had smaller CN indices than the five youngest CI users in this study.

conclusionsThe functional status of the CN for individual CI users was estimated by our newly developed analytical models. Model predictions of CN function for individual adult CI users were positively and significantly correlated with speech perception performance. The models presented in this study may be useful for understanding and/or predicting CI outcomes for individual patients.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsAdultChildCochlear NerveEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFunctional StatusHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID32826505
PMCPMC8156737
OpenAlexW3080570369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.