ReviewCurrent opinion in oncology2020
A precision medicine approach to management of acute myeloid leukemia in older adults.
Review in Current opinion in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hematopoietic Aging and Leukemia: Mechanistic and Therapeutic Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- How to Read a Next-Generation Sequencing Report for AML and MDS? What Hematologists Need to Know.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Risk factors affect accurate prognosis in ASXL1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.Cancer cell international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTherapy selection in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be challenging because of a higher incidence of high-risk cytogenetic and molecular features conferring chemoresistance and poor functional status leading to increased treatment-related toxicities. The purpose of this review is to highlight the recent advances in precision medicine in AML that have shown promise to improve outcomes of older adults. RECENT
findingsThe utilization of next generation sequencing to identify and target actionable mutations can influence therapy selection in one-third of patients and can result in higher response rates as well as survival compared with those who do not receive targeted therapy. Oral targeted agents are available for AML with IDH 1, IDH2, or FLT3 mutations. Low-intensity venetoclax-based regimens have shown high rates of responses in AML, particularly among those with NPM1 and IDH2 mutations; responses are often durable and associated with minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. Multiple studies have demonstrated the prognostic significance of flow cytometric MRD, with potential implications for subsequent therapy. SUMMARY: Novel approaches for AML risk-stratification, MRD assessment, and a precision medicine approach offer significant promise to improve survival and quality of life of older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.