Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32826386›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2021

Evaluating how licensing-law strategies will impact disparities in tobacco retailer density: a simulation in Ohio.

Peter F Craigmile, Nathaniel Onnen, Elli Schwartz, Allison Glasser, Megan E Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Relationship between Combined State and Local Tobacco Retail Licensing Laws and Retailer Density: The Case in California (2012-2021).Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spatial Clustering of Tobacco Retailers Near US Public Schools.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Factors Associated with Quit Interest and Quit Attempts among Young Adult JUUL Users.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter F CraigmileDepartment of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Nathaniel OnnenDepartment of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Elli SchwartzCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Allison GlasserCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Megan E RobertsCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA roberts.1558@osu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4743-2145

Funding

Evaluating how licensing-law strategies will change neighborhood disparities in tobacco retailer densityR21CA212308 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERTS, MEGAN ELEANOR · 2017 to 2018
$323k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA212308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess tobacco licensing-law strategies (eg, restricting the sale of tobacco near schools, banning the sale of tobacco in pharmacies) in terms of the equity of their impact and ability to correct existing disparities in tobacco retailer density.

methodsWe geocoded all 11 392 tobacco retailers in Ohio, categorised neighbourhoods based on their demographic characteristics and calculated current disparities in tobacco retailer density. We next simulated the four main types of licensing-law strategies (capping-based, declustering-based, school-based and pharmacy-based), as well as strategy combinations. Finally, using statistical methods that account for residual spatial dependence, we evaluated how each strategy would impact density disparities.

findingsThe most impactful licensing-law strategy depended on the type of community. School-based reductions were equitable for low-income, African-American and urban neighbourhoods (eg, eliminating retailers from 1000 feet of all schools produced a 9.2% reduction in the log retailer rate for neighbourhoods with a low prevalence of African-Americans and a 17.7% reduction for neighbourhoods with a high prevalence of African-Americans). Conversely, capping-based reductions were equitable for rural neighbourhoods. Pharmacy-based reductions demonstrated inequitable impacts.

conclusionLicensing-law strategies could be a central tobacco control effort that benefits both the overall population and vulnerable communities. Policymakers will need to consider their community's characteristics when selecting licensing-law strategies to correct (rather than inadvertently widen) density disparities. But when matched with the appropriate strategy, high-risk communities could remove over 20% of their tobacco retailers.

Indexed as

Tobacco ProductsCommerceHumansOhioTobacco Usedisparitiesenvironmentpublic policy

Identifiers

PMID32826386
PMCPMC7897331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.