Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32826334›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Broad host range of SARS-CoV-2 predicted by comparative and structural analysis of ACE2 in vertebrates.

Joana Damas, Graham M Hughes, Kathleen C Keough, Corrie A Painter, Nicole S Persky, Marco Corbo, Michael Hiller, Klaus-Peter Koepfli, Andreas R Pfenning, Huabin Zhao and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 436 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
436citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

436 citing papers in PubMed, 681 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

376 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Joana DamasThe Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0003-4857-2510
Graham M HughesSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3088-345X
Kathleen C KeoughGraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences and Pharmacogenomics, Quantitative Biosciences Consortium, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94117.ORCID 0000-0002-7481-0511
Corrie A PainterCancer Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0000-0001-6174-1548
Nicole S PerskyGenetic Perturbation Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0000-0002-9948-2761
Marco CorboThe Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0002-4566-2724
Michael HillerMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3024-1449
Klaus-Peter KoepfliCenter for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Front Royal, VA 22630.ORCID 0000-0001-7281-0676
Andreas R PfenningDepartment of Computational Biology, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.ORCID 0000-0002-3447-9801
Huabin ZhaoDepartment of Ecology, Tibetan Centre for Ecology and Conservation at WHU-TU, Hubei Key Laboratory of Cell Homeostasis, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7848-6392
Diane P GenereuxBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0000-0001-5770-0989
Ross SwoffordBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0000-0003-3676-8479
Katherine S PollardGladstone Institute of Data Science and Biotechnology, San Francisco, CA 94158.ORCID 0000-0002-9870-6196
Oliver A RyderSan Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, Escondido, CA 92027.ORCID 0000-0003-2427-763X
Martin T NweeiaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115.ORCID 0000-0001-7079-4123
Kerstin Lindblad-TohBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0000-0001-8338-0253
Emma C TeelingSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3309-1346
Elinor K KarlssonBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0000-0002-4343-3776
Harris A LewinThe Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; Lewin@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-7287
Broad Institute · USGladstone Institutes · USUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of California, Davis · USCarnegie Mellon University · USJohn Muir Health · USMax Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems · DESmithsonian Conservation Biology Institute · USSmithsonian Institution · USTibet University · CNUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

The 200 mammals project: sequencing genomes by a novel cost-effective method, yielding a high resolution annotation of the human genome.R01HG008742 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI BIRREN, BRUCE W., KARLSSON, ELINOR · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of COVID-19. The main receptor of SARS-CoV-2, angiotensin I converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), is now undergoing extensive scrutiny to understand the routes of transmission and sensitivity in different species. Here, we utilized a unique dataset of ACE2 sequences from 410 vertebrate species, including 252 mammals, to study the conservation of ACE2 and its potential to be used as a receptor by SARS-CoV-2. We designed a five-category binding score based on the conservation properties of 25 amino acids important for the binding between ACE2 and the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Only mammals fell into the medium to very high categories and only catarrhine primates into the very high category, suggesting that they are at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. We employed a protein structural analysis to qualitatively assess whether amino acid changes at variable residues would be likely to disrupt ACE2/SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binding and found the number of predicted unfavorable changes significantly correlated with the binding score. Extending this analysis to human population data, we found only rare (frequency <0.001) variants in 10/25 binding sites. In addition, we found significant signals of selection and accelerated evolution in the ACE2 coding sequence across all mammals, and specific to the bat lineage. Our results, if confirmed by additional experimental data, may lead to the identification of intermediate host species for SARS-CoV-2, guide the selection of animal models of COVID-19, and assist the conservation of animals both in native habitats and in human care.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAnimalsBetacoronavirusBinding SitesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Evolution, MolecularGenetic VariationHost SpecificityHumansPandemicsPeptidyl-Dipeptidase APneumonia, ViralProtein BindingReceptors, VirusSARS-CoV-2Amino AcidsPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AReceptors, VirusSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2ACE2comparative genomicsCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2species conservation

Identifiers

PMID32826334
PMCPMC7486773
OpenAlexW3080128212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.