Observational studyNeurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation2020
CSF neurofilament light chain testing as an aid to determine treatment strategies in MS.
Observational study in Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein as biomarkers of peripheral nervous system involvement in multiple sclerosis: diagnostic and prognostic evaluation.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Neurofilament Light Chain Concentration in the Prediction of Treatment Response in Multiple Sclerosis.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Effects of cladribine on intrathecal and peripheral B and plasma cells.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2025Article
- Reference range for serum neurofilament light chain: findings from healthy Thai adults.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Matching proposed clinical and MRI criteria of aggressive multiple sclerosis to serum and cerebrospinal fluid markers of neuroaxonal and glial injury.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Current use of fluid biomarkers as outcome measures in Multiple Sclerosis (MS): a review of ongoing pharmacological clinical trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Review
- Emerging imaging and liquid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis.European journal of immunology · 2023Review
- Disease activity 4.5 years after starting cladribine: experience in 264 patients with multiple sclerosis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2023Article
- Early blood neurofilament light chain and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody levels associate with different disease courses of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disease in children.Brain communications · 2023Article
- Serum-Based Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration and Multiple Sclerosis.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Emerging Biomarkers of Multiple Sclerosis in the Blood and the CSF: A Focus on Neurofilaments and Therapeutic Considerations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- CSF neurofilament light chain predicts 10-year clinical and radiologic worsening in multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical · 2021Article
- Subcutaneous cladribine to treat multiple sclerosis: experience in 208 patients.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2021Article
- The Evolution of Neurofilament Light Chain in Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Is CSF neurofilament light chain measurement relevant for MS?Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2020Article
- Multiple sclerosis as a biological and clinical continuum: from risk factors to the early stages of disease.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the use of CSF neurofilament light chain (NfL) measurements in clinical practice as well as their effect on treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with MS.
methodsThis was an observational cohort study of patients with MS who had a CSF NfL measurement between December 2015 and July 2018 as part of their routine clinical care. Treatment strategies were classified as "No Treatment/No Escalation" (no treatment or no escalation of treatment) or "Treatment/Escalation" (first-line injectable/oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), highly active DMTs, or treatment escalation). Change in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores was evaluated after 1-year follow-up.
resultsOf 203 patients with MS, 117 (58%) had relapsing-remitting MS. Disease activity was most frequently indicated by elevated CSF NfL (n = 85), followed by clinical (n = 81) and MRI activity (n = 65). CSF NfL measurements were independently associated with clinical (
conclusionsCSF NfL measurements informed treatment strategies, alongside clinical and MRI measures. CSF NfL levels were the only indicator of disease activity in a subset of patients, which was more pronounced in patients with PMS. Elevated CSF NfL was associated with more Treatment/Escalation strategies, which had an impact on EDSS outcomes at 1 year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.