ReviewHearing research2021
Improving older adults' understanding of challenging speech: Auditory training, rapid adaptation and perceptual learning.
Review in Hearing research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptual Training for People With Parkinson's Disease.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026Article
- Cognitive Predictors of Perception and Adaption to Dysarthric Speech in Older Adults.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Interconnected declines in audition vision and cognition in healthy aging.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Neuroplasticity of Speech-in-Noise Processing in Older Adults Assessed by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS).Brain topography · 2024Article
- Cochlear-implant listeners benefit from training with time-compressed speech, even at advanced ages.JASA express letters · 2024Article
- From first encounters to longitudinal exposure: a repeated exposure-test paradigm for monitoring speech adaptation.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Adaptive Syllable Training Improves Phoneme Identification in Older Listeners with and without Hearing Loss.Audiology research · 2022Article
- Effects of training and using an audio-tactile sensory substitution device on speech-in-noise understanding.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Auditory Perceptual Exercises in Adults Adapting to the Use of Hearing Aids.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Speech Perception in Older Adults: An Interplay of Hearing, Cognition, and Learning?Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- A Perceptual Learning Approach for Dysarthria Remediation: An Updated Review.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Review
- Processing of Degraded Speech in Brain Disorders.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Detection and Recognition of Asynchronous Auditory/Visual Speech: Effects of Age, Hearing Loss, and Talker Accent.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Auditory Learning and Generalization in Older Adults: Evidence from Voice Discrimination Training.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The literature surrounding auditory perceptual learning and auditory training for challenging speech signals in older adult listeners is highly varied, in terms of both study methodology and reported outcomes. In this review, we discuss some of the pertinent features of listener, stimulus, and training protocol. Literature regarding the elicitation of auditory perceptual learning for time-compressed speech, non-native speech, and noise-vocoded speech is reviewed, as are auditory training protocols designed to improve speech-in-noise recognition. The literature is synthesized to establish some over-arching findings for the aging population, including an intact capacity for auditory perceptual learning, but a limited transfer of learning to untrained stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.