Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32825843›Full record

SynthesisJournal of ovarian research2020

Telomere length in granulosa cells and leukocytes: a potential marker of female fertility? A systematic review of the literature.

Anne-Julie Fattet, Simon Toupance, Simon N Thornton, Nicolas Monnin, Jean-Louis Guéant, Athanase Benetos, Isabelle Koscinski

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of ovarian research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Oocyte-cumulus cell interaction: a key factor in early embryo development.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Association study ofInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne-Julie FattetLaboratory of Biology of Reproduction-CECOS Lorraine, University Hospital of Nancy, 10 rue du Dr Heydenreich, 54000, Nancy, France.
Simon ToupanceUniversité de Lorraine, Inserm, DCAC, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Simon N ThorntonUniversité de Lorraine, Inserm, DCAC, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Nicolas MonninCentre AMP Majorelle-Laboratory ATOUTBIO, 95, rue Ambroise Paré, 54000, Nancy, France.
Jean-Louis GuéantUniversité de Lorraine, Inserm, NGERE, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Athanase BenetosUniversité de Lorraine, Inserm, DCAC, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Isabelle KoscinskiLaboratory of Biology of Reproduction-CECOS Lorraine, University Hospital of Nancy, 10 rue du Dr Heydenreich, 54000, Nancy, France. koscinski.isa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0436-486X
Inserm · FRCECOS University · PK

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-15-IDEX-04-LUE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of a continuously increased delay of motherhood and of an increase of the incidence of premature ovarian failure, it is of the greatest interest to dispose of a predictive marker of the duration of the fertility window. Unfortunately, current available markers of women's fertility (hormonal rates or echography count of small follicles) have a poor predictive value of premature ovarian failure. In the last ten years, some studies have suggested that telomere length may be correlated with premature ovarian failure, but the results of these studies are contradictory.In accordance with guidelines from Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), this systematic review of the literature selected studies evaluating telomere length or telomerase activity in granulosa cells and/or in leukocytes as a premature ovarian failure marker.Five publications (252 premature ovarian failure patients) were included in this review of experimental evidence. Two of them studied telomere length and/or telomerase activity in granulosa cells and 4 in leukocytes in women with premature ovarian failure. For each study, authors determined if there was a positive or a negative correlation between telomeric parameters and premature ovarian failure.3 studies (178 premature ovarian failure patients) found shorter telomere length in granulosa cells and/or leukocytes and/or lower telomerase activity in premature ovarian failure patients. 2 studies (74 premature ovarian failure patients) presented contradictory results about the correlation of leucocyte telomere length with premature ovarian failure.Shorter telomeres and diminished telomerase activity in granulosa cells appear to be associated with ovarian insufficiency. However, the number of studies and of subjects within are low and the methodology questionable. The confirmation of these results is essential with more subjects, better defined populations and more adapted methodology, in order to consider telomere length in granulosa cells and/or in leucocytes as an early and reliable marker for the decline of ovarian function.

Indexed as

BiomarkersFemaleGranulosa CellsHumansLeukocytesPrimary Ovarian InsufficiencyTelomereTelomere HomeostasisBiomarkersPremature ovarian failurePremature ovarian insufficiencyPrimary ovarian insufficiencyTelomeraseTelomere length

Identifiers

PMID32825843
PMCPMC7442985
OpenAlexW3081019494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.