Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32825836›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2020

Social network support and harm reduction activities in a peer researcher-led pilot study, British Columbia, Canada.

Sulaf Elkhalifa, Ehsan Jozaghi, Samona Marsh, Erica Thomson, Delilah Gregg, Jane Buxton, Ann Jolly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Peer Support and Overdose Prevention Responses: A Systematic 'State-of-the-Art' Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sulaf ElkhalifaSchool of Public Health, University of Ottawa, Room 101, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, KIH 8 M5, Canada.
Ehsan JozaghiSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Samona MarshVancouver Area Network of Drug Users, 380 East Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6A 1P4, Canada.
Erica ThomsonUniversity of Fraser Valley, 33844 King Road, Abbotsford, British Columbia, V2S 7 M8, Canada.
Delilah GreggVancouver Area Network of Drug Users, 380 East Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6A 1P4, Canada.
Jane BuxtonSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Ann JollySchool of Public Health, University of Ottawa, Room 101, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, KIH 8 M5, Canada. ajolly@uottawa.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7453-6217
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CAUniversity of the Fraser Valley · CAVancouver Native Health Society · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople who smoke drugs (PWSD) are at high risk of both infectious disease and overdose. Harm reduction activities organized by their peers in the community can reduce risk by providing education, safer smoking supplies, and facilitate access to other services. Peers also provide a network of people who provide social support to PWSD which may reinforce harm reducing behaviors. We evaluated the numbers of supportive network members and the relationships between received support and participants' harm-reducing activities.

methodsInitial peer-researchers with past or current lived drug use experience were employed from communities in Abbotsford and Vancouver to interview ten friends from their social networks who use illegal drugs mainly through smoking. Contacts completed a questionnaire about people in their own harm reduction networks and their relationships with each other. We categorized social support into informational, emotional, and tangible aspects, and harm reduction into being trained in the use of, or carrying naloxone, assisting peers with overdoses, using brass screens to smoke, obtaining pipes from service organizations and being trained in CPR.

resultsFifteen initial peer researchers interviewed 149 participants who provided information on up to 10 people who were friends or contacts and the relationships between them. People who smoked drugs in public were 1.46 (95% CI, 1.13-1.78) more likely to assist others with possible overdoses if they received tangible support; women who received tangible support were 1.24 (95% CI; 1.02-1.45) more likely to carry and be trained in the use of naloxone. There was no relationship between number of supportive network members and harm reduction behaviors.

conclusionsIn this pilot study, PWSD who received tangible support were more likely to assist peers in possible overdoses and be trained in the use of and/or carry naloxone, than those who did not receive tangible support. Future work on the social relationships of PWSD may prove valuable in the search for credible and effective interventions.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionPeer GroupSocial NetworkingSocial SupportAdultBritish ColumbiaDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansMaleNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsPilot ProjectsSmokingSubstance-Related DisordersNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsCanadaChain link samplingCommunity-based researchDrug use disorderHarm reductionSocial network support

Identifiers

PMID32825836
PMCPMC7441606
OpenAlexW3080791997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.