Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32825688›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Perceived Value Influencing the Household Waste Sorting Behaviors in Rural China.

Ying Ma, Mansoor Ahmed Koondhar, Shengke Liu, Huiling Wang, Rong Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Determinants of Satisfaction with Solid Waste Management Services: A Central-Local Comparison in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Cultural Consumption and Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Waste Separation Management in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Assessment of rice and wheat production efficiency based on data envelopment analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ying MaSchool of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, No. 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China.
Mansoor Ahmed KoondharSchool of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, No. 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China.
Shengke LiuSchool of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, No. 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China.
Huiling WangSchool of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, No. 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China.
Rong KongSchool of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, No. 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waste sorting is the cardinal measurement to solve the problem of low efficiency of rural environmental governance and to alleviate environmental pollution by reduction, recycling, and harmlessness in rural areas. However, non-excludable and non-rival features of public goods easily cause a wide free-rider problem, which results in a low frequency of participation in the waste sorting of rural people. Based on the theory of the utility maximization of the rational economic man, this paper investigates survey data of 688 farm households in three cities and three counties of Shaanxi Province to explore the effect of the perceived value on the household waste classification behavior based on cost-benefit analysis. The results show that perceived benefit and perceived cost are important perceived value factors affecting farmers' participation in waste sorting. Specifically, the spiritual benefit of the perceived benefit has a significantly positive impact on classification behavior, while the time cost, physical cost, and material cost of the perceived cost have a negative impact on waste classification behavior. Further study of the heterogeneity of income impact shows that time cost only has a significant impact on the high-income group of farmers' classification behavior, while spiritual benefit and learning cost only affect the low-income group of farmers' waste classification behavior. Material cost has different influence directions on high- and low-income groups. In view of the aforementioned findings, this study highlights corresponding policy implications from the perspective of perceived benefit and perceived cost.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental PolicyRecyclingAdolescentAdultChinaCitiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultperceived benefitperceived costperceived valueutilitywaste sorting behavior

Identifiers

PMID32825688
PMCPMC7503964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.