Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
Strategies for Referring Cancer Patients in a Smoking Cessation Program.
Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing an Evidence-Based Smoking Cessation Referral Tool Kit in a High-Risk Lung Cancer Screening Clinic.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Reach, Acceptability, and Effectiveness of Proactive Outreach and Varenicline with Cancer-Focused Counseling for Patients with Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial.JCO oncology advances · 2026Article
- Understanding cancer patients' desire to quit tobacco without assistance: A mixed-methods study.Journal of health psychology · 2024Article
- Smoking cessation counselling patterns in cancer patients - survey of Lebanese physicians.Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Article
- Implementation and evaluation of a smoking cessation checklist implemented within Australian cancer services.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2022Article
- Tobacco Use and Tobacco Treatment Referral Response of Patients With Cancer: Implementation Outcomes at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center.JCO oncology practice · 2022Article
- Time to put it out - nurse-facilitated tobacco treatment in a comprehensive cancer center.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- Tobacco Use and Treatment among Cancer Survivors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most people who smoke and develop cancer are unable to quit smoking. To address this, many cancer centers have now opened smoking cessation programs specifically designed to help cancer patients to quit. An important question has now emerged-what is the most effective approach for engaging smokers within a cancer center in these smoking cessation programs? We report outcomes from a retrospective observational study comparing three referral methods-traditional referral, best practice advisory (BPA), and direct outreach-on utilization of the Duke Cancer Center Smoking Cessation Program. We found that program utilization rate was higher for direct outreach (5.4%) than traditional referral (0.8%),
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.