Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32825624›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet?

Patrícia Bota, Chen Wang, Ana Fred, Hugo Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MMDCP: Multi-Modal Dental Caries Prediction for Decision Support System Using Deep Learning.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrícia BotaInstituto Superior Técnico (IST), Department of Bioengineering (DBE) and Instituto de Telecomunicações (IT), Av. Rovisco Pais n. 1, Torre Norte-Piso 10, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0514-7517
Chen WangState Key Laboratory of Media Convergence Production Technology and Systems, Xinhua News Agency & Future Media Convergence Institute (FMCI), Xinhua Net, Jinxuan Building, No. 129 Xuanwumen West Street, Beijing 100031, China.
Ana FredInstituto Superior Técnico (IST), Department of Bioengineering (DBE) and Instituto de Telecomunicações (IT), Av. Rovisco Pais n. 1, Torre Norte-Piso 10, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1320-5024
Hugo SilvaInstituto Superior Técnico (IST), Department of Bioengineering (DBE) and Instituto de Telecomunicações (IT), Av. Rovisco Pais n. 1, Torre Norte-Piso 10, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6764-8432

Funding

European Regional Development Fund TIN2017-85409-PInstituto de Telecomunicações UIDB/50008/2020Xinhua Net Future Media Convergence Institute S-0003-LX-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion recognition based on physiological data classification has been a topic of increasingly growing interest for more than a decade. However, there is a lack of systematic analysis in literature regarding the selection of classifiers to use, sensor modalities, features and range of expected accuracy, just to name a few limitations. In this work, we evaluate emotion in terms of low/high arousal and valence classification through Supervised Learning (SL), Decision Fusion (DF) and Feature Fusion (FF) techniques using multimodal physiological data, namely, Electrocardiography (ECG), Electrodermal Activity (EDA), Respiration (RESP), or Blood Volume Pulse (BVP). The main contribution of our work is a systematic study across five public datasets commonly used in the Emotion Recognition (ER) state-of-the-art, namely: (1) Classification performance analysis of ER benchmarking datasets in the arousal/valence space; (2) Summarising the ranges of the classification accuracy reported across the existing literature; (3) Characterising the results for diverse classifiers, sensor modalities and feature set combinations for ER using accuracy and F1-score; (4) Exploration of an extended feature set for each modality; (5) Systematic analysis of multimodal classification in DF and FF approaches. The experimental results showed that FF is the most competitive technique in terms of classification accuracy and computational complexity. We obtain superior or comparable results to those reported in the state-of-the-art for the selected datasets.

Indexed as

ArousalEmotionsSupervised Machine LearningElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleRespirationemotion recognitionmachine learningphysiological signalssignal processing

Identifiers

PMID32825624
PMCPMC7506892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.