ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet?
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multimodal EEG-based psychological risk representation method using spatiotemporal graph attention and adaptive gated fusion.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Improved method for stress detection using bio-sensor technology and machine learning algorithms.MethodsX · 2024Article
- Drivers' Mental Engagement Analysis Using Multi-Sensor Fusion Approaches Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Building a Low-Cost Wireless Biofeedback Solution: Applying Design Science Research Methodology.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automatic detection of the mental state in responses towards relaxation.Neural computing & applications · 2023Article
- MMDCP: Multi-Modal Dental Caries Prediction for Decision Support System Using Deep Learning.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- EEG emotion recognition based on cross-frequency granger causality feature extraction and fusion in the left and right hemispheres.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Neuroorganoleptics: Organoleptic Testing Based on Psychophysiological Sensing.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Affective State during Physiotherapy and Its Analysis Using Machine Learning Methods.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Emotion and Stress Recognition Related Sensors and Machine Learning Technologies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emotion recognition based on physiological data classification has been a topic of increasingly growing interest for more than a decade. However, there is a lack of systematic analysis in literature regarding the selection of classifiers to use, sensor modalities, features and range of expected accuracy, just to name a few limitations. In this work, we evaluate emotion in terms of low/high arousal and valence classification through Supervised Learning (SL), Decision Fusion (DF) and Feature Fusion (FF) techniques using multimodal physiological data, namely, Electrocardiography (ECG), Electrodermal Activity (EDA), Respiration (RESP), or Blood Volume Pulse (BVP). The main contribution of our work is a systematic study across five public datasets commonly used in the Emotion Recognition (ER) state-of-the-art, namely: (1) Classification performance analysis of ER benchmarking datasets in the arousal/valence space; (2) Summarising the ranges of the classification accuracy reported across the existing literature; (3) Characterising the results for diverse classifiers, sensor modalities and feature set combinations for ER using accuracy and F1-score; (4) Exploration of an extended feature set for each modality; (5) Systematic analysis of multimodal classification in DF and FF approaches. The experimental results showed that FF is the most competitive technique in terms of classification accuracy and computational complexity. We obtain superior or comparable results to those reported in the state-of-the-art for the selected datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.