Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32825617›Full record

ArticleViruses2020

X69R Is a Non-Essential Gene That, When Deleted from African Swine Fever, Does Not Affect Virulence in Swine.

Elizabeth Ramirez-Medina, Elizabeth Vuono, Sarah Pruitt, Ayushi Rai, Ediane Silva, James Zhu, Lauro Velazquez-Salinas, Douglas P Gladue, Manuel V Borca

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Deletion of theViruses · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative genomic and transcriptomic analyses of African swine fever virus strains.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Viruses · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth Ramirez-MedinaAgricultural Research Service (ARS), Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, NY 11944, USA.
Elizabeth VuonoAgricultural Research Service (ARS), Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, NY 11944, USA.
Sarah PruittAgricultural Research Service (ARS), Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, NY 11944, USA.
Ayushi RaiAgricultural Research Service (ARS), Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, NY 11944, USA.
Ediane SilvaAgricultural Research Service (ARS), Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, NY 11944, USA.
James ZhuAgricultural Research Service (ARS), Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, NY 11944, USA.
Lauro Velazquez-SalinasAgricultural Research Service (ARS), Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, NY 11944, USA.
Douglas P GladueAgricultural Research Service (ARS), Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, NY 11944, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7894-0233
Manuel V BorcaAgricultural Research Service (ARS), Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, NY 11944, USA.
Agricultural Research Service · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever virus (ASFV) is currently causing devastating outbreaks in Asia and Europe, and the ASFV strain Georgia (ASFV-G) is responsible for these outbreaks. ASFV-G is highly virulent and continues to be maintained in these outbreak areas, apparently without suffering significant genomic or phenotypic changes. When comparing the genome of ASFV-G to other isolates, a thus-far uncharacterized gene, X69R, is highly conserved and, interestingly, is similar to another ASFV uncharacterized gene, J64R. All sequenced ASFV isolates have one or both of these genes, X69R or J64R, suggesting that the presence of at least one of these genes may be necessary for ASFV replication and or virulence. The X69R gene is present in the ASFV-G genome while J64R is absent. To assess the importance of X69R in ASFV-G functionality, we developed a recombinant virus by deleting the X69R gene from the ASFV-G genome (ASFV-G-ΔX69R). ASFV-G-ΔX69R had the same replication kinetics in primary swine macrophage cultures as the parental ASFV-G, indicating that the X69R gene is not essential for ASFV-G viability or efficient replication in the main target cell during in vivo infection. In addition, swine intramuscularly inoculated with a low dose (10

Indexed as

Genes, ViralAfrican Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCells, CulturedGene DeletionMacrophagesMicrobial ViabilitySequence AlignmentSwineTranscription, GeneticViral ProteinsVirulenceVirus ReplicationViral ProteinsAfrican swine feverASFASFV

Identifiers

PMID32825617
PMCPMC7551905
OpenAlexW3080681382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.