Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32825612›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate: An Open-Access Online Tool for Lesion Classification with High Accuracy.

Stephan Ellmann, Michael Schlicht, Matthias Dietzel, Rolf Janka, Matthias Hammon, Marc Saake, Thomas Ganslandt, Arndt Hartmann, Frank Kunath, Bernd Wullich and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stephan EllmannDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2737-5526
Michael SchlichtDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias DietzelDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Rolf JankaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias HammonDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Marc SaakeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Thomas GanslandtDepartment of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6864-8936
Arndt HartmannInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Frank KunathDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Bernd WullichDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Michael UderDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Tobias BäuerleDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC 1181 - project Z02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) approaches could help to objectify reporting on prostate mpMRI, but their use in many cases is hampered due to common-built algorithms that are not publicly available. The aim of this study was to develop an open-access CADx algorithm with high accuracy for classification of suspicious lesions in mpMRI of the prostate. This retrospective study was approved by the local ethics commission, with waiver of informed consent. A total of 124 patients with 195 reported lesions were included. All patients received mpMRI of the prostate between 2014 and 2017, and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided and targeted biopsy within a time period of 30 days. Histopathology of the biopsy cores served as a standard of reference. Acquired imaging parameters included the size of the lesion, signal intensity (T2w images), diffusion restriction, prostate volume, and several dynamic parameters along with the clinical parameters patient age and serum PSA level. Inter-reader agreement of the imaging parameters was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients. The dataset was stratified into a train set and test set (156 and 39 lesions in 100 and 24 patients, respectively). Using the above parameters, a CADx based on an Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm was developed on the train set, and tested on the test set. Performance optimization was focused on maximizing the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputer-aided diagnosismachine learningprostate cancerprostate mpMRI

Identifiers

PMID32825612
PMCPMC7565879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.