Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32825517›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Comparison of Early Feeding Practices in Mother-Father Dyads and Possible Generalization of an Efficacious Maternal Intervention to Fathers' Feeding Practices: A Secondary Analysis.

Lynne A Daniels, Kimberley M Mallan, Elena Jansen, Jan M Nicholson, Anthea M Magarey, Karen Thorpe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lynne A DanielsSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia.
Kimberley M MallanSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia.
Elena JansenSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6051-4148
Jan M NicholsonJudith Lumley Centre, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia.
Anthea M MagareyNutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Karen ThorpeSchool of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8927-4064
Queensland University of Technology · AUFlinders University · AUJohns Hopkins University · USLa Trobe University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare feeding practices within mother-father dyads and explore whether outcomes of an efficacious intervention for mothers generalised to fathers' feeding practices. The NOURISH RCT evaluated an early feeding intervention that promoted positive feeding practices to support development of healthy eating habits and growth. The intervention was delivered to first-time mothers via 2 × 12 week modules commencing when children were 4 and 14 months. Mothers self-reported feeding practice outcomes at child age 2 years using validated scales (1 = low to 5 = high) from the Child Feeding Questionnaire (CFQ). Nine months later, an independent cross-sectional descriptive study to investigate fathers' feeding practices was initiated. Fathers were recruited by contacting (via letter) mothers participating in two pre-existing studies, including the NOURISH trial. Fathers completed a feeding practices questionnaire, similar to that used for NOURISH outcome assessments. Seventy-five fathers recruited via the NOURISH cohort (21% response) returned questionnaires. Response data from this subset of fathers were then linked to the corresponding NOURISH maternal data. Complete data were available from 70 dyads. Compared with mothers, fathers self-reported higher concern about child overweight (2.2 vs. 1.3), restriction (3.6 vs. 2.9) and pressure (2.6 vs. 2.1), all

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyFathersFeeding BehaviorMothersAdultBody WeightChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleParent-Child RelationsParentingSurveys and Questionnaireschild feeding practicesfathersinterventionmothers

Identifiers

PMID32825517
PMCPMC7504426
OpenAlexW3065703142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.