Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32825441›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

How to Achieve a Healthier and More Sustainable Europe by 2040 According to the Public? Results of a Five-Country Questionnaire Survey.

Iva Zvěřinová, Vojtěch Máca, Milan Ščasný, Rosa Strube, Sibila Marques, Diana Dubová, Martin Kryl, Daniela Craveiro, Timothy Taylor, Aline Chiabai and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Iva ZvěřinováEnvironment Centre, Charles University, 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9440-0405
Vojtěch MácaEnvironment Centre, Charles University, 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7069-443X
Milan ŠčasnýEnvironment Centre, Charles University, 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5040-1281
Rosa StrubeCollaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production, 42107 Wuppertal, Germany.
Sibila MarquesInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IUL, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7295-6923
Diana DubováEnvironment Centre, Charles University, 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin KrylEnvironment Centre, Charles University, 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Daniela CraveiroInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IUL, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal.
Timothy TaylorEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro TR1 3HD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2625-7408
Aline ChiabaiBasque Centre for Climate Change, Biscaya, 48004 Pais Vasco, Spain.
Silvestre García de JalónBasque Centre for Climate Change, Biscaya, 48004 Pais Vasco, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to understand public preferences for several future scenarios of achieving a healthier, more equitable and sustainable Europe, which differ in the way the society is organized (individualistically vs. collectively) and in the driving sector (public vs. private). To achieve this aim, we conducted a questionnaire survey using representative samples for five European countries in 2018. About three thousand respondents chose among the four scenarios presented within four different contexts (green spaces, active mobility, energy-efficient housing, food consumption) or none of them. A majority of people in the five European countries were ready to accept one of the scenarios. We found significant differences in preferences according to socioeconomic backgrounds and values of respondents. People above 35 years old, those who were less educated, and those in the lowest household income tertile were less supportive of all scenarios. The heterogeneity in preferences associated with differences in socioeconomic backgrounds was larger for the scenario in which society is organized individualistically and driven by the private sector. Smaller distinctions were found in case of the scenario in which society is organized collectively and is driven by the public sector. Departing from social psychological theories, we examine the role of altruistic, biospheric, egoistic, hedonic, and security values. People with stronger biospheric values were more likely to accept scenarios, particularly those which are driven by the public sector and where there is more collective organisation. Those with a more egoistic value orientation were more likely to have higher preferences for scenarios where the private sector had a dominant role. The policy implications, in terms of the selection and framing of policy measures to enhance public support, are discussed.

Indexed as

Health EquityPrivate SectorSustainable DevelopmentTransportationAdultEuropeFemaleHumansMalePublic SectorSurveys and Questionnairesactive mobilityequityfood consumptionfuture scenariosgreen spaceshousingpolicy supportpublic acceptabilitypublic healthsustainabilityvalues

Identifiers

PMID32825441
PMCPMC7503986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.