ArticleNutrients2020
An Investigation of the Influence of Age and Saliva Flow on the Oral Retention of Whey Protein and Its Potential Effect on the Perception and Acceptance of Whey Protein Beverages.
Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Modifying Whey Protein Fortified Drinks and Foods to Improve Perception, Whilst Accounting for Individual Differences in Age (At Home Study)
Evaluation of Protein Bioavailability, Satiety and Appetite Responses to Protein Fortified Porridge in Older Adults
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrafast and Deep Saliva Proteome Reveals the Dynamic of Human Saliva With Aging by Orbitrap Astral Mass Spectrometer.IET nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Role of Exosomes in Salivary Gland Tumors and Technological Advances in Their Assessment.Cancers · 2024Review
- Promoting Protein Intake in an Ageing Population: Product Design Implications for Protein Fortification.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Obtaining a Reliable Diagnostic Biomarker for Diabetes Mellitus by Standardizing Salivary Glucose Measurements.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- The relation between stimulated salivary flow and the temporal consumption experience of a liquid oral nutritional supplement.Appetite · 2021Article
- Investigating Methods to Mitigate Whey Protein Derived Mouthdrying.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Whey Protein Derived Mouthdrying Found to Relate Directly to Retention Post Consumption but Not to Induced Differences in Salivary Flow Rate.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Influence of Age and Individual Differences on Mouthfeel Perception of Whey Protein-Fortified Products: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Consistent Effects of Whey Protein Fortification on Consumer Perception and Liking of Solid Food Matrices (Cakes and Biscuits) Regardless of Age and Saliva Flow.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein fortified products are regularly recommended to older adults to improve nutritional status and limit sarcopenia. However protein fortification can elicit negative sensory attributes such as mouthdrying. Sensitivity to mouthdrying can increase with age, yet the influence of saliva flow and mucoadhesion remain uncertain. Here, two studies tested different whey protein beverages (WPB); 22 healthy younger volunteers completed a pilot and 84 healthy volunteers from two age groups (18-30; 65+) completed the main study. In both studies salivary flow rates (mL/min) were measured and saliva samples were collected at time intervals post beverage consumption to measure mucoadhesion to the oral cavity, where protein concentration was analysed by Bradford Assay. Volunteers rated perception and acceptability of WPBs in the main study. WPB consumption resulted in significantly increased protein concentration (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.