Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32825091›Full record

ArticleCells2020

Microcurrent Stimulation Triggers MAPK Signaling and TGF-β1 Release in Fibroblast and Osteoblast-Like Cell Lines.

Evangelia Konstantinou, Zoi Zagoriti, Anastasia Pyriochou, Konstantinos Poulas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Accelerated Bone Healing via Electrical Stimulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Electrical Microneedles for Wound Treatment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Wound healing and signaling pathways.Open life sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evangelia KonstantinouLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, 26504 Rio, Greece.
Zoi ZagoritiLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, 26504 Rio, Greece.
Anastasia PyriochouLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, 26504 Rio, Greece.
Konstantinos PoulasLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, 26504 Rio, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5397-1543
University of Patras · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing constitutes an essential process for all organisms and involves a sequence of three phases. The disruption or elongation of any of these phases can lead to a chronic or non-healing wound. Electrical stimulation accelerates wound healing by mimicking the current that is generated in the skin after any injury. Here, we sought to identify the molecular mechanisms involved in the healing process following in vitro microcurrent stimulation-a type of electrotherapy. Our results concluded that microcurrents promote cell proliferation and migration in an ERK 1/2- or p38-dependent way. Furthermore, microcurrents induce the secretion of transforming growth factor-beta-1 (TGF-β1) in fibroblasts and osteoblast-like cells. Interestingly, transcriptomic analysis uncovered that microcurrents enhance the transcriptional activation of genes implicated in Hedgehog, TGF-β1 and MAPK signaling pathways. Overall, our results demonstrate that microcurrents may enhance wound closure through a combination of signal transductions, via MAPK's phosphorylation, and the transcriptional activation of specific genes involved in the healing process. These mechanisms should be further examined in vivo, in order to verify the beneficial effects of microcurrents in wound or fracture healing.

Indexed as

Cell LineFibroblastsHumansMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3OsteoblastsSignal TransductionTransforming Growth Factor beta1Wound HealingMAPK3 protein, humanMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3Transforming Growth Factor beta1electrical stimulationfibroblastsosteoblast-like cellssignaling pathways

Identifiers

PMID32825091
PMCPMC7564311
OpenAlexW3060686163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.