Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32824991›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

The Effect of Labelling and Visual Properties on the Acceptance of Foods Containing Insects.

Klaudia Modlinska, Dominika Adamczyk, Katarzyna Goncikowska, Dominika Maison, Wojciech Pisula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Feasibility of UsingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Consumers' Acceptability and Perception of Edible Insects as an Emerging Protein Source.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Klaudia ModlinskaInstitute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 1 Jaracza St., 00-378 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2161-9019
Dominika AdamczykFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 5/6 Stawki St., 00-183 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0082-0271
Katarzyna GoncikowskaFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 5/6 Stawki St., 00-183 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9763-3370
Dominika MaisonFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 5/6 Stawki St., 00-183 Warsaw, Poland.
Wojciech PisulaInstitute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 1 Jaracza St., 00-378 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5777-0549

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki UMO-2017/27/B/HS6/01197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introducing insects as a source of nutrients (e.g., protein) plays a key role in many countries' environmental policies. However, westerners generally reject insects as an ingredient of food products and meals. The aim of our study was to assess if explicitly labelling food as containing insects and/or implying it by manipulating the appearance of food influences the participants' perception of food products or their behavioral reaction to such products. Participants were asked to try a range of foods, none of which contained ingredients derived from insects. However, the experimental conditions varied with regard to food labelling (insect content) and appearance (traces of insect-like ingredients). We observed the participants' non-verbal behavioral reactions to the foods. Next, the respondents filled in a questionnaire evaluating the food's properties. Additionally, we asked the participants to fill in a set of questionnaires measuring other variables (food neophobia, disgust, variety seeking, etc.) The results showed that products labelled as containing insects are consumed with reluctance and in lower quantities despite their appearance. In addition, people with lower general neophobia and a higher tendency to seek variety tried the insect-labelled samples sooner than people from the other groups. Recommendations for marketing strategies are provided.

Indexed as

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake DisorderConsumer BehaviorEdible InsectsFoodFood LabelingAdultAnimalsFemaleFood TechnologyHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultbehaviorconsumer studiesdisgustedible insectsentomophagyfood labellingfood sustainabilityfood technology neophobiainsect-based foodsneophobianovel foodperception of foodvariety seeking

Identifiers

PMID32824991
PMCPMC7551702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.