Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32824730›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Toxicity of Carbon Nanomaterials and Their Potential Application as Drug Delivery Systems: In Vitro Studies in Caco-2 and MCF-7 Cell Lines.

Rosa Garriga, Tania Herrero-Continente, Miguel Palos, Vicente L Cebolla, Jesús Osada, Edgar Muñoz, María Jesús Rodríguez-Yoldi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Drug Delivery Systems for Natural Medicines in Cancer Therapy.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosa GarrigaDepartamento de Química Física, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Tania Herrero-ContinenteDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.
Miguel PalosDepartamento de Farmacología y Fisiología, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.
Vicente L CebollaInstituto de Carboquímica ICB-CSIC, Miguel Luesma Castán 4, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9786-9217
Jesús OsadaDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8251-8457
Edgar MuñozInstituto de Carboquímica ICB-CSIC, Miguel Luesma Castán 4, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.
María Jesús Rodríguez-YoldiDepartamento de Farmacología y Fisiología, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3595-7668
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESInstituto de Carboquímica · ES

Funding

CIBEROBN CB06/ 03/1012Diputación General de Aragón E25_20R and B16-17REuropean Grant Interreg/SUDOE SOE1/PI/E0123Spanish Ministry of Economy and Innovation SAF 2016-75441-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon nanomaterials have attracted increasing attention in biomedicine recently to be used as drug nanocarriers suitable for medical treatments, due to their large surface area, high cellular internalization and preferential tumor accumulation, that enable these nanomaterials to transport chemotherapeutic agents preferentially to tumor sites, thereby reducing drug toxic side effects. However, there are widespread concerns on the inherent cytotoxicity of carbon nanomaterials, which remains controversial to this day, with studies demonstrating conflicting results. We investigated here in vitro toxicity of various carbon nanomaterials in human epithelial colorectal adenocarcinoma (Caco-2) cells and human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cells. Carbon nanohorns (CNH), carbon nanotubes (CNT), carbon nanoplatelets (CNP), graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (GO) and nanodiamonds (ND) were systematically compared, using Pluronic F-127 dispersant. Cell viability after carbon nanomaterial treatment followed the order CNP < CNH < RGO < CNT < GO < ND, being the effect more pronounced on the more rapidly dividing Caco-2 cells. CNP produced remarkably high reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. Furthermore, the potential of these materials as nanocarriers in the field of drug delivery of doxorubicin and camptothecin anticancer drugs was also compared. In all cases the carbon nanomaterial/drug complexes resulted in improved anticancer activity compared to that of the free drug, being the efficiency largely dependent of the carbon nanomaterial hydrophobicity and surface chemistry. These fundamental studies are of paramount importance as screening and risk-to-benefit assessment towards the development of smart carbon nanomaterial-based nanocarriers.

Indexed as

Caco-2camptothecincarbon nanomaterialscytotoxicitydoxorubicindrug deliveryMCF-7

Identifiers

PMID32824730
PMCPMC7466705
OpenAlexW3050250725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.