Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32824559›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Evaluation of Hyperparameter Optimization in Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Decoding Imagined Speech EEG.

Ciaran Cooney, Attila Korik, Raffaella Folli, Damien Coyle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Decoding imagined speech with delay differential analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Real-Time Navigation in Google Street ViewSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Linguistic representation of vowels in speech imagery EEG.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. [Key technology of brain-computer interaction based on speech imagery].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ciaran CooneyIntelligent Systems Research Centre, Ulster University, Londonderry BT48 7JL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2974-9838
Attila KorikIntelligent Systems Research Centre, Ulster University, Londonderry BT48 7JL, UK.
Raffaella FolliInstitute for Research in Social Sciences, Ulster University, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, UK.
Damien CoyleIntelligent Systems Research Centre, Ulster University, Londonderry BT48 7JL, UK.
University of Ulster · GB

Funding

Northern Ireland Department for the Economy N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classification of electroencephalography (EEG) signals corresponding to imagined speech production is important for the development of a direct-speech brain-computer interface (DS-BCI). Deep learning (DL) has been utilized with great success across several domains. However, it remains an open question whether DL methods provide significant advances over traditional machine learning (ML) approaches for classification of imagined speech. Furthermore, hyperparameter (HP) optimization has been neglected in DL-EEG studies, resulting in the significance of its effects remaining uncertain. In this study, we aim to improve classification of imagined speech EEG by employing DL methods while also statistically evaluating the impact of HP optimization on classifier performance. We trained three distinct convolutional neural networks (CNN) on imagined speech EEG using a nested cross-validation approach to HP optimization. Each of the CNNs evaluated was designed specifically for EEG decoding. An imagined speech EEG dataset consisting of both words and vowels facilitated training on both sets independently. CNN results were compared with three benchmark ML methods: Support Vector Machine, Random Forest and regularized Linear Discriminant Analysis. Intra- and inter-subject methods of HP optimization were tested and the effects of HPs statistically analyzed. Accuracies obtained by the CNNs were significantly greater than the benchmark methods when trained on both datasets (words: 24.97%,

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesDeep LearningSpeechElectroencephalographyMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computerbrain–computer interface (BCI)convolutional neural networks (CNN)deep learningelectroencephalography (EEG)hyperparameter optimizationimagined speechmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID32824559
PMCPMC7472624
OpenAlexW3049410214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.