ReviewCancers2020
Trends in Bone Metastasis Modeling.
Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phylogeography of Bone Metastasis: Clonal Evolution, Skeletal Niche Adaptation, and Clinical Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The osteoporotic niche as a metabolic sanctuary for breast cancer dormancy and reactivation: A mechanistic perspective.iScience · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of breast cancer dormancy in bone metastasis.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2026Review
- From Technological Innovation to Clinical Translation: Progress and Challenges in 3D Bioprinting for the Development of Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis Models.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- The Scientific Case for Animal Models: A Perspective From Musculoskeletal Researchers.FASEB bioAdvances · 2026Article
- Cancer metastasisFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- A novel bone and cancer cells co-culture methodology to model breast cancer metastasis to bone ex vivo.BMC methods · 2026Review
- Crosstalk between bone metastatic cancer cells and sensory nerves in bone metastatic progression.Life science alliance · 2024Article
- Microfluidic Applications in Prostate Cancer Research.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Modelling bone metastasis in spheroids to study cancer progression and screen cisplatin efficacy.Cell proliferation · 2024Article
- Bone mineral slows down breast cancer cells.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Muscle and Bone Defects in Metastatic Disease.Current osteoporosis reports · 2022Review
- Advancing Treatment of Bone Metastases through Novel Translational Approaches Targeting the Bone Microenvironment.Cancers · 2022Review
- Advances in Engineered Three-Dimensional (3D) Body Articulation Unit Models.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Review
- Extracellular Vesicles in Tumors: A Potential Mediator of Bone Metastasis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Bone is one of the most common sites for cancer metastasis. Bone tissue is composed by different kinds of cells that coexist in a coordinated balance. Due to the complexity of bone, it is impossible to capture the intricate interactions between cells under either physiological or pathological conditions. Hence, a variety of in vivo and in vitro approaches have been developed. Various models of tumor-bone diseases are routinely used to provide valuable information on the relationship between metastatic cancer cells and the bone tissue. Ideally, when modeling the metastasis of human cancers to bone, models would replicate the intra-tumor heterogeneity, as well as the genetic and phenotypic changes that occur with human cancers; such models would be scalable and reproducible to allow high-throughput investigation. Despite the continuous progress, there is still a lack of solid, amenable, and affordable models that are able to fully recapitulate the biological processes happening in vivo, permitting a correct interpretation of results. In the last decades, researchers have demonstrated that three-dimensional (3D) methods could be an innovative approach that lies between bi-dimensional (2D) models and animal models. Scientific evidence supports that the tumor microenvironment can be better reproduced in a 3D system than a 2D cell culture, and the 3D systems can be scaled up for drug screening in the same way as the 2D systems thanks to the current technologies developed. However, 3D models cannot completely recapitulate the inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity found in patients. In contrast, ex vivo cultures of fragments of bone preserve key cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions and allow the study of bone cells in their natural 3D environment. Moreover, ex vivo bone organ cultures could be a better model to resemble the human pathogenic metastasis condition and useful tools to predict in vivo response to therapies. The aim of our review is to provide an overview of the current trends in bone metastasis modeling. By showing the existing in vitro and ex vivo systems, we aspire to contribute to broaden the knowledge on bone metastasis models and make these tools more appealing for further translational studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.