Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32824388›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT Imaging for the Detection and Staging of Pancreatic NET: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Matteo Bauckneht, Domenico Albano, Salvatore Annunziata, Giulia Santo, Priscilla Guglielmo, Viviana Frantellizzi, Alessia Branca, Cristina Ferrari, Antonio Vento, Alessia Mirabile and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Increased [EJNMMI reports · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. [Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Diagnostic performance of PET/CT in the detection of liver metastases in well-differentiated NETs.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Clinical value ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  16. Imaging in translational cancer research.Cancer biology & medicine · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. [Cancers · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo BaucknehtNuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1937-9116
Domenico AlbanoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0810-6494
Salvatore AnnunziataNuclear Medicine Unit, IRCSS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Giulia SantoNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Priscilla GuglielmoNuclear Medicine Unit, AO Brotzu, 09134 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9150-4367
Viviana FrantellizziDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3497-4236
Alessia BrancaNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Cristina FerrariNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Antonio VentoDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morpho-Functional Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.
Alessia MirabileDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morpho-Functional Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.
Anna Giulia NappiNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9046-6378
Laura EvangelistaNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5955-9488
Pierpaolo AlongiUnit of Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione Istituto G.Giglio, 90015 Cefalù, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8397-1640
Riccardo LaudicellaDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morpho-Functional Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2842-0301
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Messina · ITAzienda Ospedaliera G. Brotzu · ITFondazione Istituto G. Giglio di Cefalù · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the diagnostic performance of Somatostatin Receptor Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (SSR-PET/CT) for the detection of primary lesion and initial staging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). A comprehensive literature search up to January 2020 was performed selecting studies in presence of: sample size ≥10 patients; index test (i.e., 68Ga-DOTATOC or 68Ga-DOTANOC or 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT); and outcomes (i.e., detection rate (DR), true positive, true negative, false positive, and false-negative). The methodological quality was evaluated with QUADAS-2. Pooled DR and pooled sensitivity and specificity for the identification of the primary tumor were assessed by a patient-based and a lesion-based analysis. Thirty-eight studies were selected for the qualitative analysis, while 18 papers were included in the meta-analysis. The number of pNET patients ranged from 10 to 142, for a total of 1143 subjects. At patient-based analysis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for the assessment of primary pNET were 79.6% (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 71-87%) and 95% (95%CI: 75-100%) with a heterogeneity of 59.6% and 51.5%, respectively. Pooled DR for the primary lesion was 81% (95%CI: 65-90%) and 92% (95%CI: 80-97%), respectively, at patient-based and lesion-based analysis. In conclusion, SSR-PET/CT has high DR and diagnostic performances for primary lesion and initial staging of pNETs.

Indexed as

neuroendocrine tumorspancreaspositron emission tomographysomatostatin receptor analogs

Identifiers

PMID32824388
PMCPMC7459584
OpenAlexW3049269623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.