Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32824326›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Pattern of Recurrence and Patient Survival after Perioperative Chemotherapy with 5-FU, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Docetaxel (FLOT) for Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma in Patients Treated Outside Clinical Trials.

Torben Glatz, Rasmus Verst, Jasmina Kuvendjiska, Peter Bronsert, Heiko Becker, Jens Hoeppner, Birte Kulemann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Assessment of methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic biomarker in esophagogastric adenocarcinomas.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Torben GlatzDepartment of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hölkeskampiring 40, 44625 Herne, Germany.
Rasmus VerstCenter for Surgery, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6927-7882
Jasmina KuvendjiskaCenter for Surgery, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Peter BronsertInstitute for SurgicalPathology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str 115A, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8558-0347
Heiko BeckerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79098 Freiburg, Germany.
Jens HoeppnerCenter for Surgery, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3485-7446
Birte KulemannCenter for Surgery, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 5-FU, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Docetaxel (FLOT) protocol provides superior oncologic results compared to other perioperative chemotherapeutic protocols for the treatment of non-metastatic esophagogastric cancer (EGAC). Survival and the pattern of recurrence of EGAC after FLOT and curative tumor resection are analyzed in a collective of patients treated outside clinical trials.

methodsTwo-hundred-seventy-seven patients with EGAC (cT3-4 and/or cN+) were treated with perioperative FLOT-chemotherapy plus curative surgery between 2009 and 2018. Data were analyzed retrospectively from a prospective database.

resultsTwo-hundred-twenty-eight patients were included in the analysis. Postoperative in-hospital mortality was 2%. The median survival was 61-months, and median recurrence-free survival was 42 months. Multivariate analysis identified postoperative nodal status and T-stage as independent predictors of improved overall and recurrence-free survival. Administration of adjuvant chemotherapy failed to be significant for overall survival but was an independent predictor of recurrence-free survival. Recurrence occurred after a median of 9 months (range 1-46 months). Eighty-nine percent of recurrence occurred during the first 24 months. The rate of local recurrence was low. After surgery for gastric cancer, the major recurrence site was peritoneal carcinomatosis (56%), while esophageal cancer recurred mostly as metastasis to distant organs (78%). The specific site of recurrence had no impact on overall survival time.

conclusionReal-life application of FLOT shows oncologic results comparable to clinical trials. Recurrence after FLOT and surgery for EGAC occurs predominantly early within the first two years after surgery and in the form of distant organ metastasis for esophageal tumors or peritoneal carcinomatosis for gastric tumors.

Indexed as

adenocarcinomaadjuvant chemotherapyesophageal cancergastric cancerhistopathological regressionperioperative chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32824326
PMCPMC7464040
OpenAlexW3049539764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.