ArticleMicromachines2020
Simulation and Optimization of Electromagnetic Absorption of Polycarbonate/CNT Composites Using Machine Learning.
Article in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Empowered Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Materials: From Forward Prediction to Generative Inverse Design.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multiscale construction of wave-absorbing carbon nanomaterials.Discover nano · 2025Review
- Data-Driven Materials Research and Development for Functional Coatings.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Multiscale Computational and Artificial Intelligence Models of Linear and Nonlinear Composites: A Review.Small science · 2024Article
- Bridging Nanomanufacturing and Artificial Intelligence-A Comprehensive Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Recent Trends in Polymeric Foams and Porous Structures for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Applications.Polymers · 2024Review
- Theoretical Prediction of Electrical Conductivity Percolation of Poly(lactic acid)-Carbon Nanotube Composites in DC and RF Regime.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Absorption Performances of PLA-Montmorillonite Nanocomposites Thin Films in Salisbury and Rozanov Configurations: Influence of Aging and Mechanical Recycling.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Machine Learning for Property Prediction and Optimization of Polymeric Nanocomposites: A State-of-the-Art.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Predictive Optimization of Electrical Conductivity of Polycarbonate Composites at Different Concentrations of Carbon Nanotubes: A Valorization of Conductive Nanocomposite Theoretical Models.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic devices that transmit, distribute, or utilize electrical energy create electromagnetic interference (EMI) that can lead to malfunctioning and degradation of electronic devices. EMI shielding materials block the unwanted electromagnetic waves from reaching the target material. EMI issues can be solved by using a new family of building blocks constituted of polymer and nanofillers. The electromagnetic absorption index of this material is calculated by measuring the "S-parameters". In this article, we investigated the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the EMI shielding field by developing a new system based on a multilayer perceptron neural network designed to predict the electromagnetic absorption of polycarbonate-carbon nanotubes composites films. The proposed system included 15 different multilayer perception (MLP) networks; each network was specialized to predict the absorption value of a specific category sample. The selection of appropriate networks was done automatically, using an independent block. Optimization of the hyper-parameters using hold-out validation was required to ensure the best results. To evaluate the performance of our system, we calculated the similarity error, precision accuracy, and calculation time. The results obtained over our database showed clearly that the system provided a very good result with an average accuracy of 99.7997%, with an overall average calculation time of 0.01295 s. The composite based on polycarbonate-5 wt.% carbon nanotube was found to be the ultimate absorber over microwave range according to Rozanov formalism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.