ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
A Robotic Cognitive Architecture for Slope and Dam Inspections.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative Technologies to Improve Occupational Safety in Mining and Construction Industries-Part I.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Performance Comparison of Meta-Heuristics Applied to Optimal Signal Design for Parameter Identification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Fuzzy Gain-Scheduling PID for UAV Position and Altitude Controllers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Photogrammetric Process to Monitor Stress Fields Inside Structural Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Sensor Information Sharing Using a Producer-Consumer Algorithm on Small Vehicles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Swarm Robotics: A Perspective on the Latest Reviewed Concepts and Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Deep Learning Applied to Vegetation Identification and Removal Using Multidimensional Aerial Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Big construction enterprises, such as electrical power generation dams and mining slopes, demand continuous visual inspections. The sizes of these structures and the necessary level of detail in each mission requires a conflicting set of multi-objective goals, such as performance, quality, and safety. It is challenging for human operators, or simple autonomous path-following drones, to process all this information, and thus, it is common that a mission must be repeated several times until it succeeds. This paper deals with this problem by developing a new cognitive architecture based on a collaborative environment between the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and other agents focusing on optimizing the data gathering, information processing, and decision-making. The proposed architecture breaks the problem into independent units ranging from sensors and actuators up to high-level intelligence processes. It organizes the structures into data and information; each agent may request an individual behavior from the system. To deal with conflicting behaviors, a supervisory agent analyzes all requests and defines the final planning. This architecture enables real-time decision-making with intelligent social behavior among the agents. Thus, it is possible to process and make decisions about the best way to accomplish the mission. To present the methodology, slope inspection scenarios are shown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.