Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32824073›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension.

Jihyun Lee, Jiyoung Woo, Ah Reum Kang, Young-Seob Jeong, Woohyun Jung, Misoon Lee, Sang Hyun Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: a bibliometric analysis.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Applications of deep learning models in precision prediction of survival rates for heart failure patients.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jihyun LeeSCH Media Labs, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5485-2776
Jiyoung WooSCH Media Labs, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Korea.
Ah Reum KangSCH Media Labs, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0732-5313
Young-Seob JeongSCH Media Labs, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Korea.
Woohyun JungDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon 14584, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7786-7679
Misoon LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon 14584, Korea.
Sang Hyun KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon 14584, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6267-7365
Soonchunhyang University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2020R1I1A3056858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypotensive events in the initial stage of anesthesia can cause serious complications in the patients after surgery, which could be fatal. In this study, we intended to predict hypotension after tracheal intubation using machine learning and deep learning techniques after intubation one minute in advance. Meta learning models, such as random forest, extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost), and deep learning models, especially the convolutional neural network (CNN) model and the deep neural network (DNN), were trained to predict hypotension occurring between tracheal intubation and incision, using data from four minutes to one minute before tracheal intubation. Vital records and electronic health records (EHR) for 282 of 319 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from October 2018 to July 2019 were collected. Among the 282 patients, 151 developed post-induction hypotension. Our experiments had two scenarios: using raw vital records and feature engineering on vital records. The experiments on raw data showed that CNN had the best accuracy of 72.63%, followed by random forest (70.32%) and Xgboost (64.6%). The experiments on feature engineering showed that random forest combined with feature selection had the best accuracy of 74.89%, while CNN had a lower accuracy of 68.95% than that of the experiment on raw data. Our study is an extension of previous studies to detect hypotension before intubation with a one-minute advance. To improve accuracy, we built a model using state-of-art algorithms. We found that CNN had a good performance, but that random forest had a better performance when combined with feature selection. In addition, we found that the examination period (data period) is also important.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHypotensionMachine LearningAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, Computeranesthesiabiomedical sensordeep learninghypotension predictionmachine learningvital records

Identifiers

PMID32824073
PMCPMC7472016
OpenAlexW3049375016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.