ArticleCancers2020
Multi-Parametric Deep Learning Model for Prediction of Overall Survival after Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Glioblastoma Patients.
Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients using machine learning and deep learning: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Deep learning features from diffusion tensor imaging improve glioma stratification and identify risk groups with distinct molecular pathway activities.EBioMedicine · 2021Trial
- Deep learning-based cross-attention fusion of multimodal MRI for survival prediction and risk stratification in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Glioblastoma and Blood Microenvironment Predictive Model for Life Expectancy of Patients.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Added value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in deep learning-based prediction of local recurrence in grade 4 adult-type diffuse gliomas patients.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prediction of Rapid Early Progression and Survival Risk with Pre-Radiation MRI in WHO Grade 4 Glioma Patients.Cancers · 2023Article
- Predicting Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Survival after Curative Surgery via Deep Learning of Diffusion MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Radiomics for precision medicine in glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Review
- The application value of deep learning in the background of precision medicine in glioblastoma.Science progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the performance of a deep learning-based survival-prediction model, which predicts the overall survival (OS) time of glioblastoma patients who have received surgery followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). The medical records of glioblastoma patients who had received surgery and CCRT between January 2011 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Based on our inclusion criteria, 118 patients were selected and semi-randomly allocated to training and test datasets (3:1 ratio, respectively). A convolutional neural network-based deep learning model was trained with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and clinical profiles to predict OS. The MRI was reconstructed by using four pulse sequences (22 slices) and nine images were selected based on the longest slice of glioblastoma by a physician for each pulse sequence. The clinical profiles consist of personal, genetic, and treatment factors. The concordance index (C-index) and integrated area under the curve (iAUC) of the time-dependent area-under-the-curve curves of each model were calculated to evaluate the performance of the survival-prediction models. The model that incorporated clinical and radiomic features showed a higher C-index (0.768 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.759, 0.776)) and iAUC (0.790 (95% CI: 0.783, 0.797)) than the model using clinical features alone (C-index = 0.693 (95% CI: 0.685, 0.701); iAUC = 0.723 (95% CI: 0.716, 0.731)) and the model using radiomic features alone (C-index = 0.590 (95% CI: 0.579, 0.600); iAUC = 0.614 (95% CI: 0.607, 0.621)). These improvements to the C-indexes and iAUCs were validated using the 1000-times bootstrapping method; all were statistically significant (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.