Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32823939›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Multi-Parametric Deep Learning Model for Prediction of Overall Survival after Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Glioblastoma Patients.

Han Gyul Yoon, Wonjoong Cheon, Sang Woon Jeong, Hye Seung Kim, Kyunga Kim, Heerim Nam, Youngyih Han, Do Hoon Lim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Radiomics for precision medicine in glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Han Gyul YoonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9515-1623
Wonjoong CheonSamsung Advanced Institute for Health Science & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Sang Woon JeongSamsung Advanced Institute for Health Science & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Hye Seung KimStatistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Kyunga KimStatistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Heerim NamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Korea.
Youngyih HanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Do Hoon LimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KRSamsung (South Korea) · KRKangbuk Samsung Hospital · KR

Funding

Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning 2019M2A2B4096537, 2019R1F1A1062775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the performance of a deep learning-based survival-prediction model, which predicts the overall survival (OS) time of glioblastoma patients who have received surgery followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). The medical records of glioblastoma patients who had received surgery and CCRT between January 2011 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Based on our inclusion criteria, 118 patients were selected and semi-randomly allocated to training and test datasets (3:1 ratio, respectively). A convolutional neural network-based deep learning model was trained with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and clinical profiles to predict OS. The MRI was reconstructed by using four pulse sequences (22 slices) and nine images were selected based on the longest slice of glioblastoma by a physician for each pulse sequence. The clinical profiles consist of personal, genetic, and treatment factors. The concordance index (C-index) and integrated area under the curve (iAUC) of the time-dependent area-under-the-curve curves of each model were calculated to evaluate the performance of the survival-prediction models. The model that incorporated clinical and radiomic features showed a higher C-index (0.768 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.759, 0.776)) and iAUC (0.790 (95% CI: 0.783, 0.797)) than the model using clinical features alone (C-index = 0.693 (95% CI: 0.685, 0.701); iAUC = 0.723 (95% CI: 0.716, 0.731)) and the model using radiomic features alone (C-index = 0.590 (95% CI: 0.579, 0.600); iAUC = 0.614 (95% CI: 0.607, 0.621)). These improvements to the C-indexes and iAUCs were validated using the 1000-times bootstrapping method; all were statistically significant (

Indexed as

deep learningglioblastomaradiomicssurvival prediction

Identifiers

PMID32823939
PMCPMC7465791
OpenAlexW3049707208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.