Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32823872›Full record

ReviewToxins2020

Current Insights on Vegetative Insecticidal Proteins (Vip) as Next Generation Pest Killers.

Tahira Syed, Muhammad Askari, Zhigang Meng, Yanyan Li, Muhammad Ali Abid, Yunxiao Wei, Sandui Guo, Chengzhen Liang, Rui Zhang

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Whole-Genome Sequencing ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sortase-encoding genes,Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The Prospect of Hydrolytic Enzymes fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tahira SyedBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Muhammad AskariBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Zhigang MengBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8959-5685
Yanyan LiBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Muhammad Ali AbidBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Yunxiao WeiBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Sandui GuoBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Chengzhen LiangBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Rui ZhangBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

Ministry of Agriculture of China 2016ZX08005004 and 2016ZX08009003-003-004).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

InsectaPest Control, BiologicalAnimalsBacillus thuringiensisBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsCrops, AgriculturalDrug ResistanceInsecticidesPlants, Genetically ModifiedBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsInsecticidesBacillus thuringiensisinsecticidal activitypyramidsresistancevegetative insecticidal proteins

Identifiers

PMID32823872
PMCPMC7472478
OpenAlexW3049080316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.