Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32823789›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Testing an Animal Welfare Assessment Protocol for Growing-Rabbits Reared for Meat Production Based on the Welfare Quality Approach.

Nadina Botelho, Madalena Vieira-Pinto, Pau Batchelli, Joaquim Pallisera, Antoni Dalmau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review of Rat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  6. Welfare of domestic birds and rabbits transported in containers.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nadina BotelhoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CECAV, UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
Madalena Vieira-PintoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CECAV, UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8588-7071
Pau BatchelliDepartment of Animal Welfare, Institute of Agri-food Research and Technology (IRTA), Veinat de Sies s/n., 17121 Monells, Spain.
Joaquim PalliseraDepartment of Animal Welfare, Institute of Agri-food Research and Technology (IRTA), Veinat de Sies s/n., 17121 Monells, Spain.
Antoni DalmauDepartment of Animal Welfare, Institute of Agri-food Research and Technology (IRTA), Veinat de Sies s/n., 17121 Monells, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2248-6796

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) Project UIDB/CVT/00772/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to present an animal welfare assessment protocol for growing-rabbits for discussion after its implementation in 32 farms from Spain and Portugal. The protocol comprises the principles of Good Feeding, Good Housing, Good Health and Appropriate Behaviour of the Welfare Quality protocols and includes 36 welfare parameters. Overall, the protocol showed a good capacity for discrimination between farms, with scores ranging 44 to 82 points. The protocol seems reliable for the assessment of animal welfare after proper training of auditors. However, for the criteria social behaviour and other behaviours, further research is needed to ascertain if the methodology and times of observation used are appropriate. Some farms had high mortality rates with a low prevalence of health problems, while others had low mortality rates with high prevalence of health problems due to different managements of culling. The protocol should be improved, to impede farms with high mortality rates but a low prevalence of health issues the day of the audit from obtaining better scores than the second type of farms, by limiting the compensation in key measures. The main points to be solved in the growing-rabbit farms were: to provide more space to the animals; register the number of animals culled accurately; change cervical dislocation for another killing method and provide the farmers training in animal welfare.

Indexed as

animal welfareappropriate behaviourassessment protocolgood feedinggood healthgood housinggrowing-rabbits

Identifiers

PMID32823789
PMCPMC7459992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.