Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32823593›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Factors Underlying Food Choice Motives in a Brazilian Sample: The Association with Socioeconomic Factors and Risk Perceptions about Chronic Diseases.

Camila de Mello Marsola, Luís Miguel Cunha, Joana Pereira de Carvalho-Ferreira, Diogo Thimoteo da Cunha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Investigating the Association between Unhealthy Dietary Habits and Obesity among Libyan Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Do Registered Dietitians, Nutrition Students, and Laypeople Perceive Individuals with Obesity Differently?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camila de Mello MarsolaLaboratório Multidisciplinar em Alimentos e Saúde, Faculdade de Ciências Aplicadas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas-UNICAMP, R. Pedro Zaccaria, 1300, Limeira SP 13484-350, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1514-8281
Luís Miguel CunhaGreenUPorto, DGAOT, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, R. da Agrária, 747, 4485-646 Vila do Conde, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4590-7533
Joana Pereira de Carvalho-FerreiraLaboratório Multidisciplinar em Alimentos e Saúde, Faculdade de Ciências Aplicadas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas-UNICAMP, R. Pedro Zaccaria, 1300, Limeira SP 13484-350, Brazil.
Diogo Thimoteo da CunhaLaboratório Multidisciplinar em Alimentos e Saúde, Faculdade de Ciências Aplicadas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas-UNICAMP, R. Pedro Zaccaria, 1300, Limeira SP 13484-350, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5928-9265

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance code 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/12625-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/10936-0Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/05748/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDP/05748/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the food choice motives in a sample in Brazil and to identify how socioeconomic characteristics and risk perceptions about chronic diseases and weight gain affect these motives. The Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) is an instrument to analyze the motivations for food choice. The FCQ was completed by 525 adult individuals in Brazil. The participants were asked about their perceived risk of gaining weight, developing diabetes, and hypertension. Confirmatory factor analysis led to the rejection of the original FCQ structure, and, after exploratory factor analysis, 30 items of the FCQ were maintained in eight factors: Nutritional Composition, Preparation Convenience, Purchase Convenience, Mood, Sensory Appeal, Health, Price, and Familiarity. Sensory Appeal and Familiarity were, respectively, the most and the least important factors involved in food choices in this sample. A high education level, high income, age, and female sex positively affected FCQ factors (except for the Price factor). On the basis of FCQ scores, we defined five clusters: Health Driven, Practicality Concerned, Shape Concerned, Food Concerned, and Cooking Enthusiasts. In general, individuals were optimistic regarding the risk of developing diabetes, hypertension, and gaining weight, especially those from the Shape Concerned cluster. The differences in food choice motives presented here reinforce the existence of different niches of food consumption. Different types of products can attract specific target groups at the time of choice.

Indexed as

Brazilexploratory factor analysisFCQfood choicefood consumption

Identifiers

PMID32823593
PMCPMC7466213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.