ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020
The LL-100 Cell Lines Panel: Tool for Molecular Leukemia-Lymphoma Research.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognosis of second primary oral squamous cell carcinoma after hematologic malignancy: a retrospective cohort analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Vacuolar ATPase Is a Possible Therapeutic Target in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Focus on Patient Heterogeneity and Treatment Toxicity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Translocation t(6;7) in AML-M4 cell line GDM-1 results in MNX1 activation through enhancer-hijacking.Leukemia · 2023Article
- In Vitro Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Cell Line Models as Tools to Investigate Novel Immunotherapeutic Strategies.Cancers · 2022Review
- Genetic characterization and drug sensitivity study of newly derived HGBL double/triple-hit lymphoma cell lines.Blood advances · 2022Article
- A Novel Triple-Action Inhibitor Targeting B-Cell Receptor Signaling and BRD4 Demonstrates Preclinical Activity in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Molecular Genetics of Pre-B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Sister Cell Lines during Disease Progression.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021Article
- Characterization of a novel glucocorticoid-resistant human B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line, with AMPK, mTOR and fatty acid synthesis pathway inhibition.Cancer cell international · 2021Article
- Review
- Leukemia Cell Lines: In Vitro Models for the Study of Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Certified cell line models provide ideal experimental platforms to answer countless scientific questions. The LL-100 panel is a cohort of cell lines that are broadly representative of all leukemia-lymphoma entities (including multiple myeloma and related diseases), rigorously authenticated and validated, and comprehensively annotated. The process of the assembly of the LL-100 panel was based on evidence and experience. To expand the genetic characterization across all LL-100 cell lines, we performed whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing. Here, we describe the conception of the panel and showcase some exemplary applications with a focus on cancer genomics. Due diligence was paid to exclude cross-contaminated and non-representative cell lines. As the LL-100 cell lines are so well characterized and readily available, the panel will be a valuable resource for identifying cell lines with mutations in cancer genes, providing superior model systems. The data also add to the current knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of leukemia-lymphoma. Additional efforts to expand the breadth of available high-quality cell lines are clearly warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.