Observational studyIndian journal of ophthalmology2020
Biological therapy in refractory cases of uveitis and scleritis: An analysis of 18 cases from a tertiary eye care center from South India.
Observational study in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying outcome measures for clinical trials in juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis for the MIWGUC proposal: a scoping review to create domains from existing outcome measures.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2026Article
- Noninfectious uveitis: Management with biologic agents.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Emerging therapeutic targets in non-infectious uveitis and scleritis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Biologics in ocular inflammatory diseases - Experience from a tertiary referral eye care center in South India.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Treatment with Biologic Drugs in Pediatric Behçet's Disease: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Published Data.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023Review
- Tofacitinib in Refractory Scleritis: A Case Series.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2023Article
- Rise of biologics in noninfectious uveitis: a retrospective cohort study from Nepal.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Adalimumab plus Conventional Therapy versus Conventional Therapy in Refractory Non-Infectious Scleritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Biologic Therapies and Small Molecules for the Management of Non-Infectious Scleritis: A Narrative Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2021Review
- Rituximab for non-infectious Uveitis and Scleritis.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2021Review
- Commentary: Biological therapy in refractory cases of uveitis and scleritis: An analysis of 18 cases from a tertiary eye care center from South India.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of biologic therapy in a cohort of patients with various types of refractory non-infectious uveitis and scleritis. Methods: A retrospective observational study on patients with non-infectious uveitis and scleritis who were not responding or had a high recurrence rate with the conventional treatment and had received biologic therapy. Results: We studied 18 patients (33 eyes) who received biological therapy between January 2017 and November 2019. The mean age was 30 ± 17 years and mean duration of uveitis was 36.8 months (range 1-120 months). Anterior uveitis (27.7%) was most commonly observed followed by scleritis, panuveitis, posterior, and intermediate uveitis. The most common etiology was Behçet's disease (4 patients, 22.2%) followed by juvenile idiopathic arthritis (3 patients, 16.6%), granulamotosis polyangitis, and idiopathic (2 patients each, 11.1%). Majority had trialled one or more immunosuppressive and were refractory in nature. Maximum patients had received adalimumab (61%) followed by infliximab (22%), rituximab (12%), and golimumab (6%). The median prednisolone dose was reduced from 30 mg (range 7.5-60 mg) to 5 mg (range 0-10 mg) after biological therapy (P = 0.002). Significant visual improvement was observed post biologic therapy (mean log mar VA 0.41 ± 0.62 improved to 0.23 ± 0.48 at the final visit, P = 0.008). Maximum number of patients (16 patients, 89%) responded well with biological therapy. Three patients developed recurrence and systemic complications were observed in two patients. Conclusion: Biologic therapy is effective in non-infectious refractory uveitis who were resistant to conventional therapy and may prolong disease recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.