Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32823417›Full record

Observational studyIndian journal of ophthalmology2020

Biological therapy in refractory cases of uveitis and scleritis: An analysis of 18 cases from a tertiary eye care center from South India.

Soumen Sadhu, Parthopratim Dutta Majumder, Jyotirmay Biswas

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Noninfectious uveitis: Management with biologic agents.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Treatment with Biologic Drugs in Pediatric Behçet's Disease: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Published Data.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023
    Review
  6. Tofacitinib in Refractory Scleritis: A Case Series.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Rituximab for non-infectious Uveitis and Scleritis.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soumen SadhuDepartment of Uvea, Medical and Vision Research Foundations, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Parthopratim Dutta MajumderDepartment of Uvea, Medical and Vision Research Foundations, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jyotirmay BiswasDepartment of Uvea, Medical and Vision Research Foundations, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sankara Nethralaya · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of biologic therapy in a cohort of patients with various types of refractory non-infectious uveitis and scleritis. Methods: A retrospective observational study on patients with non-infectious uveitis and scleritis who were not responding or had a high recurrence rate with the conventional treatment and had received biologic therapy. Results: We studied 18 patients (33 eyes) who received biological therapy between January 2017 and November 2019. The mean age was 30 ± 17 years and mean duration of uveitis was 36.8 months (range 1-120 months). Anterior uveitis (27.7%) was most commonly observed followed by scleritis, panuveitis, posterior, and intermediate uveitis. The most common etiology was Behçet's disease (4 patients, 22.2%) followed by juvenile idiopathic arthritis (3 patients, 16.6%), granulamotosis polyangitis, and idiopathic (2 patients each, 11.1%). Majority had trialled one or more immunosuppressive and were refractory in nature. Maximum patients had received adalimumab (61%) followed by infliximab (22%), rituximab (12%), and golimumab (6%). The median prednisolone dose was reduced from 30 mg (range 7.5-60 mg) to 5 mg (range 0-10 mg) after biological therapy (P = 0.002). Significant visual improvement was observed post biologic therapy (mean log mar VA 0.41 ± 0.62 improved to 0.23 ± 0.48 at the final visit, P = 0.008). Maximum number of patients (16 patients, 89%) responded well with biological therapy. Three patients developed recurrence and systemic complications were observed in two patients. Conclusion: Biologic therapy is effective in non-infectious refractory uveitis who were resistant to conventional therapy and may prolong disease recurrence.

Indexed as

ScleritisUveitisBiological TherapyChildChild, PreschoolHumansIndiaInfantRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAnti-interleukinsanti-TNFbiologicsnon-infectious uveitis and scleritisrefractory uveitis

Identifiers

PMID32823417
PMCPMC7690551
OpenAlexW3081315736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.