ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2020
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in the treatment of macular edema in epidemic retinitis.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in uveitis: Bridging inflammation and vascular pathology.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Epidemic retinitis - Factors associated with poor visual outcomes.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Observational
- Response to 'Clinical features, optical coherence tomography findings and treatment outcomes of post-fever retinitis'.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo study efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) in resolution of macular edema in epidemic retinitis (ER).
methodsIn this retrospective, comparative study, patients diagnosed as ER with central macular thickness (CMT) ≥ 600 μm on SD-OCT at presentation were studied. Eyes which did not receive intravitreal anti-VEGF formed group A and eyes receiving additional anti-VEGF formed group B. Eyes receiving anti-VEGF monotherapy were studied separately. Cases with subsequent OCT scans with interval of more than 20 days and cases without OCT scan at the resolution were excluded. Treatment details, visual outcome, and days to resolution of macular edema were studied.
resultsMean CMT in group A (n = 8) was 820.1 μm (range 607-1004 μm) and in Group B (n = 4) was 756.0 μm (range 603-1000 μm). Macular edema resolved in 34.8 days (range: 16-65) and 39.0 days (range: 21-45) in group A and B, respectively. Two eyes with anti-VEGF monotherapy recovered in 45 and 18 days, respectively. Mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at presentation in group A was 19.1 (range: 0-61) ETDRS letters and in group B was 14.3 (range: 0-35) ETDRS letters. Mean CDVA improved to 65.7 (range: 0-85) and 50.8 (range: 20-76) ETDRS letters in group A and B, respectively. Anti-VEGF monotherapy eyes improved from 35 and 46 ETDRS letters to 70 and 85 ETDRS letters, respectively.
conclusionAdditional anti-VEGF therapy has no added advantage in speed of resolution of macular edema due to ER. A randomized controlled trial with steroids sparing "anti-VEGF monotherapy" may verify our observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.