ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2020
HLA-B27-related uveitis and seasonal variation-an Indian perspective.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Seasonal Variation in HLA-B27 Associated Uveitis.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Impact of seasonal cycle on rheumatoid arthritis based on genetic and epigenetic mechanisms.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Is there any association between the frequency of wet age-related macular degeneration recurrences and the seasons of the year?International ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Commentary: What is new in the epidemiology of HLA-B27-related uveitis?Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To study seasonal variation and systemic associations in HLA-B27 related uveitis (HBU). Methods: This was a retrospective, observational chart review conducted in a single, tertiary eye care hospital, from January 2015 to December 2019. New cases presented from January 2017 to December 2019 were studied for incidence patterns (Group X). Cases with ≥1-year follow-up were studied for systemic association (Group Y) and cases with ≥4 episodes of active uveitis were studied for recurrence pattern (Group Z). A year was divided into 3 segments of the year (SoY): 1. November-February, 2. March-June, 3. July-October. Results: We found 157 cases of HBU from January 2015 to December 2019. The incidence in Group X (n = 105) was found to be least in SoY 2 in all 3 years (2017-2019). In Group Y (n = 85), 39 cases (45.88%) were diagnosed as spondyloarthropathies, among which 20 were of ankylosing spondylitis (23.52%). More than 1/2 the total number of episodes occurring in the same SoY (SoY Max), in Group Z (n = 25), was seen in 14 (56%) cases. SoY Max was the first segment (SoY 1) for most of these cases (n = 7). In Group Z, 8 (32%) patients were on immunomodulatory therapy at presentation. Conclusion: Our study confirms seasonal variation in HBU patients by documenting the least incidence from March to June and identifies 56% of patients that can have a maximum number of recurrences in a specific season of the year. Outcomes of surgical interventions planned accordingly, and responsible environmental factors for HBU should be studied further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.