ArticleYearbook of medical informatics2020
Precision, Equity, and Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics - A Scoping Review.
Article in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applying the 5P framework to improve cancer prevention in European health systems.Journal of public health policy · 2026Article
- Identifying risk profiles and systemic architecture of online aggressive behavior among college students: a large-scale cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Machine learning used to study risk factors for chronic diseases: A scoping review.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
- Beyond the diagnostic threshold: paradigm shift in laboratory medicine from passive reaction to predictive capability.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Applications in Population and Public Health: Guidelines for Development, Testing, and Implementation.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Bias in machine learning applications to address non-communicable diseases at a population-level: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a Targeted COVID-19 Community Outreach Intervention: Case Report for Precision Public Health.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2023Article
- Dietary Oncopharmacognosy as a Crosswalk between Precision Oncology and Precision Nutrition.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Midwifery learning and forecasting: Predicting content demand with user-generated logs.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2023Article
- Color coded health data: factors related to willingness to share health information in South Asian community members in Canada.International journal of population data science · 2023Article
- Achieving Inclusivity by Design: Social and Contextual Information in Medical Knowledge.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2022Review
- The Promise of Digital Health: Then, Now, and the Future.NAM perspectives · 2022Review
- Assessing the Electronic Evidence System Needs of Canadian Public Health Professionals: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2021Article
- Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics: Recent Research Trends Moving toward Public Health Data Science.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis scoping review synthesizes the recent literature on precision public health and the influence of predictive models on health equity with the intent to highlight central concepts for each topic and identify research opportunities for the biomedical informatics community.
methodsSearches were conducted using PubMed for publications between 2017-01-01 and 2019-12-31.
resultsPrecision public health is defined as the use of data and evidence to tailor interventions to the characteristics of a single population. It differs from precision medicine in terms of its focus on populations and the limited role of human genomics. High-resolution spatial analysis in a global health context and application of genomics to infectious organisms are areas of progress. Opportunities for informatics research include (i) the development of frameworks for measuring non-clinical concepts, such as social position, (ii) the development of methods for learning from similar populations, and (iii) the evaluation of precision public health implementations. Just as the effects of interventions can differ across populations, predictive models can perform systematically differently across subpopulations due to information bias, sampling bias, random error, and the choice of the output. Algorithm developers, professional societies, and governments can take steps to prevent and mitigate these biases. However, even if the steps to avoid bias are clear in theory, they can be very challenging to accomplish in practice.
conclusionsBoth precision public health and predictive modelling require careful consideration in how subpopulations are defined and access to data on subpopulations can be challenging. While the theory for both topics has advanced considerably, there is much work to be done in understanding how to implement and evaluate these approaches in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.