Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32823285›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2020

A Liquid Biopsy to Assess Brain Tumor Recurrence: Presence of Circulating Mo-MDSC and CD14+ VNN2+ Myeloid Cells as Biomarkers That Distinguish Brain Metastasis From Radiation Necrosis Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

David C Soler, Amber Kerstetter-Fogle, Theresa Elder, Alankrita Raghavan, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan, Kevin D Cooper, Thomas S McCormick, Andrew E Sloan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Immune related biomarkers for cancer metastasis to the brain.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David C SolerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Amber Kerstetter-FogleDepartment of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Theresa ElderDepartment of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Alankrita RaghavanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jill S Barnholtz-SloanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Kevin D CooperDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center and the Case Western University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Thomas S McCormickDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center and the Case Western University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Andrew E SloanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
University School · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

Differential Diagnosis of recurrent GBM versus Radiation Necrosis using MDSCbiomarkersR21CA256573 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCORMICK, THOMAS S, SLOAN, ANDREW E · 2021 to 2022
$409k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA256573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain metastases (BM) are the most common type of brain tumor malignancy in the US. They are also the most common indication for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, the incidence of both local recurrence and radiation necrosis (RN) is increasing as treatments improve. MRI imagery often fails to differentiate BM from RN; thus, patients must often undergo surgical biopsy or resection to obtain a definitive diagnosis.

objectiveTo hypothesize that a marker of immunosuppression might serve as a surrogate marker to differentiate patients with active vs inactive cancer-including RN.

methodsWe thus purified and quantified Monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells (Mo-MDSC) by flow cytometry in patients proven by biopsy to represent BM or RN.

resultsWe report the utility of the previously reported HLA-Dr-Vnn2 Index or DVI to discriminate recurrent BM from RN using peripheral blood. The presence of CD14+ HLA-DRneg/low Mo-MDSC is significantly increased in the peripheral blood of patients with brain metastasis recurrence compared to RN (Average 61.5% vs 7%, n = 10 and n = 12, respectively, P < .0001). In contrast, expression of VNN2 on circulating CD14+ monocytes is decreased in BM patients compared to patients with RN (5.5% vs 26.5%, n = 10 and n = 12, respectively, P = .0008). In patients with biopsy confirmed recurrence of brain metastasis, the average DVI was 11.65, whereas the average DVI for RN patients was consistently <1 (Avg. of 0.17).

conclusionThese results suggest that DVI could be a useful diagnostic tool to differentiate recurrent BM from RN using a minimally invasive blood sample.

Indexed as

AgedAmidohydrolasesBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCell Adhesion MoleculesFemaleGPI-Linked ProteinsHumansLiquid BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMonocytesMyeloid-Derived Suppressor CellsNecrosisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAmidohydrolasesBiomarkers, TumorCell Adhesion MoleculesGPI-Linked ProteinsVNN2 protein, humanBrain metastasisBrain tumorsLiquid biopsyMDSCRadiation necrosisVNN2

Identifiers

PMID32823285
PMCPMC8861507
OpenAlexW3080074833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.