Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32823181›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2021

Revisiting and refining roles of neural guidance cues in circuit assembly.

Joelle M Dorskind, Alex L Kolodkin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neuronal guidance behaviours: the primary cilium perspective.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Drebrin Regulates Collateral Axon Branching in Cortical Layer II/III Somatosensory Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transcriptional Control of Axon Guidance at Midline Structures.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joelle M DorskindThe Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: jdorski1@jhmi.edu.
Alex L KolodkinThe Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: kolodkin@jhmi.edu.

Funding

Molecular and functional regeneration of the accessory optic pathwayR01EY027713 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HUBERMAN, ANDREW D, KOLODKIN, ALEX L · 2017 to 2020
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural guidance mechanisms ensure the precise targeting and synaptogenesis events essential for normal circuit function. Neuronal growth cones encounter numerous attractive and repulsive cues as they navigate toward their intermediate and final targets; temporal and spatial regulation of these responses are critical for circuit assembly. Recent work highlights the complexity of these events throughout neural development and the multifaceted functions of a wide range of guidance cues. Here, we discuss recent studies that leverage advances in genetics, single cell tracing, transcriptomics and proteomics to further our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying neural guidance and overall circuit organization.

Indexed as

Axon GuidanceCuesAxonsGrowth ConesNeurons

Identifiers

PMID32823181
PMCPMC10725571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.