Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32822542›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2020

Radiomic signatures derived from multiparametric MRI for the pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Tiantian Bian, Zengjie Wu, Qing Lin, Haibo Wang, Yaqiong Ge, Shaofeng Duan, Guangming Fu, Chunxiao Cui, Xiaohui Su

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tiantian BianBreast Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China.
Zengjie WuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China.
Qing LinBreast Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China.
Haibo WangBreast Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China.
Yaqiong GeGE Healthcare, Pudong, 210000, Shanghai, China.
Shaofeng DuanGE Healthcare, Pudong, 210000, Shanghai, China.
Guangming FuDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China.
Chunxiao CuiBreast Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China.
Xiaohui SuBreast Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the ability of radiomic signatures based on MRI to evaluate the response and efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for treating breast cancers.

methods152 patients were included in this study at our institution between March 2017 and September 2019. All patients with breast cancer underwent a preoperative breast MRI and the Miller-Payne grading system was applied to evaluate response to NAC. Quantitative parameters were compared between patients with sensitive and insensitive responses to NAC and between those with pathological complete responses (pCR) and non-pCR. Four radiomic signatures were built based on T2W imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging and their combination, and radiomics scores (Rad-score) were calculated. The combination of the clinical factors and Rad-scores created a nomogram model. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association between MRI features and independent clinical risk factors.

results20 features and 18 features were selected to build the radiomic signature for evaluating sensitivity and the possibility of pCR, respectively. The combined radiomic signature and nomogram model showed a similar discrimination in the training (AUC 0.91, 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.96, 0.86-0.98) and validation (AUC 0.93, 0.91, 95% CI, 0.86-1.00, 0.82-1.00) sets. The clinical factor model exhibited reduced performance (AUC 0.74, 0.64, 95% CI, 0.64-0.84, 0.46-0.82) in terms of NAC sensitivity and pCR.

conclusionsThe combined radiomic signature and nomogram model exhibited potential predictive power for predicting effective NAC treatment which can aid in the prognosis and guidance of treatment regimens. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Identifying a means of assessing the efficacy of NAC before surgery can guide follow-up treatment and avoid chemotherapy-induced toxicity.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingNomogramsAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsArea Under CurveBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantConfidence IntervalsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID32822542
PMCPMC8519645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.