ReviewThe British journal of radiology2021
Sharp recanalization of peripheral arterial chronic total occlusions.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced Needle-Based Strategies for Complex Calcified Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Review
- Modified Sharp Recanalization for Inferior Vena Cava Occlusion in Patient with Budd-Chiari Syndrome.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral arterial chronic total occlusions (CTOs) usually have calcified caps at either ends. When attempting endovascular recanalization, these calcified CTO caps may prevent the interventionist in crossing the lesion with conventional catheter and guidewire techniques. Using specialized CTO devices or re-entry devices can help crossing the CTO, but such devices are usually expensive, not always readily available and require specialist training prior to usage."Sharp recanalization" is an alternative method of crossing the CTOs. If it is not possible to cross the CTO with conventional catheter and guidewire technique, one can take out the floppy end of the guidewire and use the stiff or the "sharp" end of the guidewire to break the hard CTO cap. Once the CTO cap is broken, the stiff end is replaced by the floppy end of the guidewire again to proceed with balloon angioplasty and/or stenting.In order to safely use the sharp recanalization technique while minimizing the risk of perforation, sharp recanalization should only be attempted once conventional methods have failed. The interventionist should plan sharp recanalization with the vascular path in mind and decide in advance how far s/he will proceed. It can be helpful to set a time limit together with the intervention team, past which the sharp recanalization attempt will be abandoned. Using straight catheters can help directing the stiff guidewire tip to the center of the vascular lumen and reduce the risk of sub intimal dissection or arterial wall perforation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.