ArticleJournal of experimental botany2020
Non-invasive imaging reveals convergence in root and stem vulnerability to cavitation across five tree species.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutrient-mediated tree growth responses are governed by internal resource allocation: intra-organ water-carbon trade-offs and inter-organ carbon concentration gradient.Tree physiology · 2026Article
- Cortex death precedes stele failure in soybean fine roots during drought but does not prevent plant rehydration.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- Optical observations of embolism in three conifers overestimate the vulnerability of stem xylem to hydraulic dysfunction.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Article
- Stress dose explains drought recovery in Norway spruce.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- A one-way ticket: Wheat roots do not functionally refill xylem emboli following rehydration.Plant physiology · 2024Article
- In vivo X-ray microtomography locally affects stem radial growth with no immediate physiological impact.Plant physiology · 2024Article
- Hydraulic vulnerability difference between branches and roots increases with environmental aridity.Oecologia · 2024Article
- Detecting and Quantifying Xylem Embolism by Synchrotron-Based X-Ray Micro-CT.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Divergent leaf and fine root "pressure-volume relationships" across habitats with varying water availability.Plant physiology · 2022Article
- Organizing your space: The potential for integrating spatial transcriptomics and 3D imaging data in plants.Plant physiology · 2022Article
- Unlocking Drought-Induced Tree Mortality: Physiological Mechanisms to Modeling.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Root vulnerability to cavitation is challenging to measure and under-represented in current datasets. This gap limits the precision of models used to predict plant responses to drought because roots comprise the critical interface between plant and soil. In this study, we measured vulnerability to drought-induced cavitation in woody roots and stems of five tree species (Acacia aneura, Cedrus deodara, Eucalyptus crebra, Eucalytus saligna, and Quercus palustris) with a wide range of xylem anatomies. X-ray microtomography was used to visualize the accumulation of xylem embolism in stems and roots of intact plants that were naturally dehydrated to varying levels of water stress. Vulnerability to cavitation, defined as the water potential causing a 50% loss of hydraulic function (P50), varied broadly among the species (-4.51 MPa to -11.93 MPa in stems and -3.13 MPa to -9.64 MPa in roots). The P50 of roots and stems was significantly related across species, with species that had more vulnerable stems also having more vulnerable roots. While there was strong convergence in root and stem vulnerability to cavitation, the P50 of roots was significantly higher than the P50 of stems in three species. However, the difference in root and stem vulnerability for these species was small; between 1% and 31% of stem P50. Thus, while some differences existed between organs, roots were not dramatically more vulnerable to embolism than stems, and the differences observed were less than those reported in previous studies. Further study is required to evaluate the vulnerability across root orders and to extend these conclusions to a greater number of species and xylem functional types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.