ArticlePloS one2020
Using machine learning for predicting cervical cancer from Swedish electronic health records by mining hierarchical representations.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cancer Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning for Supporting Early Cancer Diagnosis in Symptomatic Patients: A Systematic Review of Model Types.Cancer medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-driven screening, early diagnosis, and treatment strategies for cervical cancer: an overview.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Review
- Small-Area Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality: Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study Using Hospital Discharge and Death Registration Data.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Cervical cancer prediction using machine learning models based on routine blood analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nationwide study on development and validation of a risk prediction model for CIN3+ and cervical cancer in Estonia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Integrating cat boost algorithm with triangulating feature importance to predict survival outcome in recurrent cervical cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Predicting Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer with Large Language Models.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer and Pre-Cancerous Lesions by Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A Model for Predicting Cervical Cancer Using Machine Learning Algorithms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Hybrid Model for Detection of Cervical Cancer Using Causal Analysis and Machine Learning Techniques.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Optimization of Cervical Cancer Screening: A Stacking-Integrated Machine Learning Algorithm Based on Demographic, Behavioral, and Clinical Factors.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- The Application of Projection Word Embeddings on Medical Records Scoring System.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic health records (EHRs) contain rich documentation regarding disease symptoms and progression, but EHR data is challenging to use for diagnosis prediction due to its high dimensionality, relative scarcity, and substantial level of noise. We investigated how to best represent EHR data for predicting cervical cancer, a serious disease where early detection is beneficial for the outcome of treatment. A case group of 1321 patients with cervical cancer were matched to ten times as many controls, and for both groups several types of events were extracted from their EHRs. These events included clinical codes, lab results, and contents of free text notes retrieved using a LSTM neural network. Clinical events are described with great variation in EHR texts, leading to a very large feature space. Therefore, an event hierarchy inferred from the textual events was created to represent the clinical texts. Overall, the events extracted from free text notes contributed the most to the final prediction, and the hierarchy of textual events further improved performance. Four classifiers were evaluated for predicting a future cancer diagnosis where Random Forest achieved the best results with an AUC of 0.70 from a year before diagnosis up to 0.97 one day before diagnosis. We conclude that our approach is sound and had excellent discrimination at diagnosis, but only modest discrimination capacity before this point. Since our study objective was earlier disease prediction than such, we propose further work should consider extending patient histories through e.g. the integration of primary health records preceding referral to hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.