SynthesisPloS one2020
Prognostic effect of pretreatment albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio in human cancers: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2020Pooled it
- Employment of the Albumin to Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio to Predict All-cause Mortality and Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Mortality in Adults Aged At Least 60 Years: An Analysis From NHANES 2003-2018.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model Based on Inflammatory and Nutritional Composite Indicators for Posthepatectomy Liver Failure Following Radical Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Association between alkaline phosphatase levels and mortality in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases: a retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a novel prognostic indicator in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis: a propensity score matching analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Prognostic significance of albumin to alkaline phosphatase ratio in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2022Article
- Pretreatment serum albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio is an independent prognosticator of survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- Role of Chronic Inflammatory Ratios in Predicting Recurrence of Resected Patients with Stage I-III Mucinous Colorectal Adenocarcinoma.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Prognostic Utility of Prechemoradiotherapy Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio in Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma Patients.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIt has been demonstrated that, for various types of cancer, the pretreatment albumin/alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) was a prognostic factor. Therefore, in order to determine AAPR's prognostic effect on cancer, the meta-analysis was hereby performed. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe relevant studies conducted before November 10, 2019, were comprehensively searched in Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase. HRs(hazard ratios) with related 95%CIs(confidence intervals) were adopted to estimate AAPR's prognostic impact on overall survival (OS) & disease-free survival (DFS).
resultsOur meta-analysis involved thirteen cohort studies, which included 5,204 cases of 8 types. The results of this meta-analysis indicated that higher AAPR was corrected with better OS (pooled HR = 0.52; 95%CI = 0.47-0.58; P<0.001) and DFS (pooled HR = 0.55; 95%CI = 0.47-0.66; P<0.001). Subgroup analysis on OS was based on the cancer system, treatment methods, and cutoff value. Moreover, higher AAPR was statistically in associated with lighter infiltration (pooled OR = 0.79; 95%CI = 0.73-0.85; P<0.001), no lymph nodes metastasis (pooled OR = 0.89; 95%CI = 0.83-0.95; P = 0.001), and no distant metastasis (pooled OR = 0.92; 95%CI = 0.86-0.99; P = 0.028).
conclusionHigher AAPR was related to better prognosis of cancer, and in cancer therapy, AAPR could be taken as a promising marker of prognosis. It might help physicians to select the most appropriate treatments by evaluating the current status of patients with cancer. Future multicenter prospective clinical trials were required to verify its applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.